行政处罚中诱惑式执法的合法运用
发布时间：2019-02-28 09:26
【摘要】：当前,“诱惑式执法”在查处流动性强、秘密化程度高、没有受害人的行政违法类案件以及违法行为本身危害小,但是其一旦发生所引发的后果危害程度很大,同时又难以取证的行政违法案件有非常好的效果。因此,在公安、质检、工商等行政执法部门越来越青睐于采用此种执法方式。但也暴露出不少现实问题,比如为了不正当利益而滥用“诱惑式执法”、行政裁量权行使的恣意性以及行政执法人员的执法水平有待提高等等。因此本文旨在分析“诱惑式执法”合法性问题的基础上,借鉴比较域外成熟的圈套诱惑理论,作出合理规制,以期“诱惑式执法”的合法的框架下健康运行。 本文分为五个部分：第一部分为“诱惑式执法”的概论,包括诱惑式执法的概念、特征以及与相关概念“钓鱼式执法”的界分；第二部分为“诱惑式执法”在我国的现状与问题,描述了诱惑式执法在立法上的、执法中的、司法中的现状；第三部分为论证诱惑式执法合法性的问题,通过分析该行为是否符合行政法基本原则以及所取得证据的是否有效；第四部分为国外诱惑式执法的比较研究,在阐述了为什么可以借鉴域外诱惑式执法理论的基础上,学习借鉴美国与德国的发达理论；第五部分通过比较分析第四部分,分别在执法主体、执法适用对象和范围、执法目的、实施方式以及实施程序方面对“诱惑式执法”进行规制,使其在合法的框架内运行。
[Abstract]:At present, "seductive law enforcement" has strong mobility in investigating and dealing with, high degree of secrecy, administrative illegal cases without victims and the harm of illegal acts themselves, but the consequences caused by its occurrence are very harmful. At the same time, it is difficult to obtain evidence of administrative illegal cases have a very good effect. Therefore, in the public security, quality inspection, industry and commerce and other administrative law enforcement departments more and more preferred to use this law enforcement method. However, many practical problems have been exposed, such as the abuse of "seductive law enforcement" for improper interests, the arbitrariness of the exercise of administrative discretion and the need to improve the level of enforcement of administrative law enforcement personnel, and so on. Therefore, this paper aims to analyze the legitimacy of "seductive law enforcement" on the basis of reference to the more mature theory of trap temptation outside the region, to make reasonable regulation, with a view to "seductive law enforcement" under the legal framework of healthy operation. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction of "seductive law enforcement", including the concept of seductive law enforcement, characteristics and related concepts of "fishing law enforcement"; The second part is the present situation and problems of "seductive law enforcement" in our country, which describes the current situation of the seductive law enforcement in legislation, in the enforcement of law, and in the administration of justice; The third part is to demonstrate the legitimacy of seductive law enforcement by analyzing whether the act conforms to the basic principles of administrative law and whether the evidence obtained is valid. The fourth part is the comparative study of foreign seductive law enforcement. On the basis of expounding why we can draw lessons from the foreign seductive law enforcement theory, we can learn from the developed theories of the United States and Germany. The fifth part regulates the "seductive law enforcement" in the aspects of the main body of the law enforcement, the object and scope of the law enforcement, the purpose of the law enforcement, the mode of implementation and the procedure of enforcement, so as to make it run within the legal framework.
【学位授予单位】：首都师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1
本文编号：2431695
[Abstract]:At present, "seductive law enforcement" has strong mobility in investigating and dealing with, high degree of secrecy, administrative illegal cases without victims and the harm of illegal acts themselves, but the consequences caused by its occurrence are very harmful. At the same time, it is difficult to obtain evidence of administrative illegal cases have a very good effect. Therefore, in the public security, quality inspection, industry and commerce and other administrative law enforcement departments more and more preferred to use this law enforcement method. However, many practical problems have been exposed, such as the abuse of "seductive law enforcement" for improper interests, the arbitrariness of the exercise of administrative discretion and the need to improve the level of enforcement of administrative law enforcement personnel, and so on. Therefore, this paper aims to analyze the legitimacy of "seductive law enforcement" on the basis of reference to the more mature theory of trap temptation outside the region, to make reasonable regulation, with a view to "seductive law enforcement" under the legal framework of healthy operation. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction of "seductive law enforcement", including the concept of seductive law enforcement, characteristics and related concepts of "fishing law enforcement"; The second part is the present situation and problems of "seductive law enforcement" in our country, which describes the current situation of the seductive law enforcement in legislation, in the enforcement of law, and in the administration of justice; The third part is to demonstrate the legitimacy of seductive law enforcement by analyzing whether the act conforms to the basic principles of administrative law and whether the evidence obtained is valid. The fourth part is the comparative study of foreign seductive law enforcement. On the basis of expounding why we can draw lessons from the foreign seductive law enforcement theory, we can learn from the developed theories of the United States and Germany. The fifth part regulates the "seductive law enforcement" in the aspects of the main body of the law enforcement, the object and scope of the law enforcement, the purpose of the law enforcement, the mode of implementation and the procedure of enforcement, so as to make it run within the legal framework.
【学位授予单位】：首都师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 冯翠花;;“钓鱼”不正当,执法应依法——评“钓鱼执法”[J];法制与社会;2010年01期
2 李志鹏;常明明;;钓鱼执法的合法性与合理性界分——上海“孙中界事件”的展开论述[J];吉林工商学院学报;2009年06期
3 田冰;;论行政执法中陷阱证据的可采性认定及规制——由“钓鱼执法”引发的证据能力理论探究[J];北京人民警察学院学报;2010年01期
4 周悦;王华春;;“钓鱼式”执法:原因剖析与矫正路径选择[J];前沿;2010年13期
5 熊樟林;;“钓鱼执法”司法审查对象的转换——从“程序”到“主观方面”[J];法学论坛;2010年04期
6 杨志刚;美国诱惑侦查法理的新近发展及启示[J];社会科学研究;2005年05期
7 ;关于德国行政处罚制度的考察报告[J];行政法学研究;1994年02期
8 李延军;;论行政调查的程序规制——法治视域下的考量[J];中山大学学报论丛;2006年11期
，本文编号：2431695
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2431695.html
