基于后新公共管理的行政问责制改革研究

发布时间：2018-05-04 23:05

本文选题：后新公共管理 + 行政问责制　；参考：《燕山大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：行政问责制是监督政府部门和行政官员履职情况的责任追究制度。实施行政问责制有利于规范行政权力的运行，督促政府及其工作人员责任行政，促进政府廉洁高效，推进社会民主进程。我国自2003年实施问责制以来，在取得巨大成就的同时也暴露出一系列问题。从后新公共管理的视角分析研究行政问责制，对行政问责制的改革和完善具有积极意义。我国行政问责制实施过程中，存在着同体问责、人治化倾向和问责体系不健全等问题，致使违法和不当行政行为得不到有效规范和惩处，严重妨碍了责任政府建设，也暴露了政府管理中责任不明、诚信缺失和吏治不严等诸多弊端，改革势在必行。借鉴新公共服务理论、整体政府理论和网络治理理论，探索出一套符合我国国情的、与当前经济政治环境相适应的行政问责制体系，是我国行政问责制改革的当务之急。就我国当前行政问责制存在的问题而言，问责程序精细化、问责制度体系化、问责客体明晰化、问责过程透明化和问责主体公众化是我国问责制改革应选择的基本维度。在此基础上，必须采取有效措施，加强行政问责文化建设，健全行政问责机制，，建立第三方评价体系，完善问责制法律体系，以确保行政问责制改革健康、高效、有序地进行。论文采用多种研究方法，研究我国行政问责制改革问题。运用矛盾分析法客观分析我国当前行政问责体制中存在着官员不同价值取向的矛盾、效率与公平的矛盾等；运用因果分析法分析我国行政问责制中存在的问题成因，预测未来行政问责制发展方向和轨迹；运用实证分析法研究中国行政问责制取得的成就，存在的问题，产生动因等。
[Abstract]:Administrative accountability system is the accountability system to supervise the performance of government departments and administrative officials. The implementation of the administrative accountability system is conducive to standardizing the operation of administrative power, urging the government and its staff to be responsible for administration, promoting the government to be clean and efficient, and promoting the process of social democracy. Since the implementation of accountability system in 2003, China has made great achievements and exposed a series of problems. The analysis and study of administrative accountability system from the perspective of post-new public management is of positive significance to the reform and perfection of administrative accountability system. In the process of implementing the administrative accountability system in our country, there are some problems such as the same body accountability, the tendency of rule by man and the imperfection of the accountability system, which results in the illegal and improper administrative behavior not being effectively regulated and punished, which seriously hinders the construction of the responsible government. It also exposed many shortcomings in government management, such as unclear responsibility, lack of integrity and lax administration of officials, etc. So reform is imperative. Drawing lessons from the new public service theory, the whole government theory and the network governance theory, to explore a suit of administrative accountability system which is in line with the national conditions of our country and adapt to the current economic and political environment, is the urgent task of the reform of the administrative accountability system in our country. With regard to the problems existing in the current administrative accountability system in our country, the refinement of the accountability procedure, the systematization of the accountability system, the clarity of the accountability object, the transparency of the accountability process and the public of the accountability subject are the basic dimensions that should be chosen for the reform of the accountability system in our country. On this basis, we must take effective measures to strengthen the construction of administrative accountability culture, perfect the administrative accountability mechanism, establish the third party evaluation system, and perfect the legal system of accountability system, so as to ensure the reform of administrative accountability system to be healthy, efficient and orderly. This paper adopts various research methods to study the reform of administrative accountability system in China. This paper analyzes objectively the contradiction of different value orientation of officials, the contradiction between efficiency and fairness in the current administrative accountability system of our country by using the contradiction analysis method, and analyzes the causes of the problems existing in the administrative accountability system of our country by using the causality analysis method. To predict the future development direction and track of administrative accountability system; to use empirical analysis to study the achievements of administrative accountability system in China, existing problems, causes and so on.
【学位授予单位】：燕山大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D630

【参考文献】