当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 行政管理论文 >

社会组织作为环境公益诉讼原告资格研究

发布时间:2018-04-13 07:44

  本文选题:环境公益诉讼 + 社会组织 ; 参考:《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:自第一次工业革命以来,人类习惯以牺牲环境为代价以促使人类社会的发展,经济水平的提高。但步入信息时代后,随着社会文明程度的加深,环境状态的恶化,对环境保护的呼声也渐渐高涨,保护环境已经成为全球共同的理念。环境资源是属于不特定多数人的共同财富,具有公共属性的特征,保护环境是全部社会主体的义务,主张环境利益也是全部社会主体的权利。对环境公益的保护成为人们的共识,环境公益诉讼理论与制度逐渐发展起来。环境公益诉讼在我国发展的已有几十年的光景,起先并没有法律的直接规定,而得益于司法部门与社会组织等主体的共同努力,由司法诉讼实践逐渐发展起来,近年来逐渐受到法律层面的重视。社会组织尤其是环保社会组织是保护环境的一线工作者,提起环境公益诉讼,由法律授予其原告资格是实现环境公益所需的必然路径。《环境保护法》的修正方案几经修改,于2015年1月1日正式实施,最大的亮点就是在多方的促进下,规定了能够提起环境公益诉讼案件的主体类型,授予了社会组织原告资格。在新《环境保护法》生效后的两年中,在环境公益诉讼案件上,由社会组织提起了几十起,占据全部该类案件的大部分。案由包括环境污染、生态破坏等等,环境公益诉讼如火如荼的开展起来的同时,也不可避免的遭遇了一些困难。本文共探讨五个方面的问题,主要运用比较分析方法、历史分析方法,力图通过深挖理论、案例覆盖、解剖说明等方式,强调社会组织是环境公益诉讼原告的适格主体,其具有理论和司法实践基础,主要剖析与解决司法实践遇到的社会组织主体资格认定问题,希望对我国环境公益诉讼在理论与实践方面的发展有所助益。
[Abstract]:Since the first Industrial Revolution, human beings have been accustomed to sacrificing the environment to promote the development of human society and the improvement of economic level.However, after entering the information age, with the deepening of social civilization, the deterioration of environmental conditions, the voice of environmental protection is gradually rising, environmental protection has become the common concept of the world.Environmental resources are the common wealth of the majority of people and have the characteristics of public attributes. Protecting the environment is the obligation of all social subjects, and the environmental interests are also the rights of all social subjects.The protection of environmental public welfare has become a common understanding, and the theory and system of environmental public interest litigation have gradually developed.Environmental public interest litigation has been developing in our country for several decades. At first, there was no direct regulation of the law, but thanks to the joint efforts of the judicial department and social organizations, the judicial litigation practice gradually developed.In recent years, attention has been gradually paid to the legal level.Social organizations, especially environmental protection social organizations, are the frontline workers of environmental protection. To file environmental public interest litigation and to grant the plaintiff qualification by law is the necessary way to realize the environmental public good. The amendment scheme of the Environmental Protection Law has been revised several times.Officially implemented on January 1, 2015, the biggest bright spot is that under the promotion of various parties, the main types of environmental public interest litigation cases can be established, and the plaintiff qualification of social organizations has been granted.In the two years since the new Environmental Protection Law came into effect, dozens of environmental public interest litigation cases have been initiated by social organizations, accounting for the majority of all such cases.Including environmental pollution, ecological damage and so on, environmental public interest litigation in full swing, but also inevitably encountered some difficulties.This paper discusses five aspects of the problems, mainly using comparative analysis method, historical analysis method, trying to through the deep excavation theory, case coverage, anatomical explanation and other ways, emphasizing that social organization is the suitably subject of environmental public interest litigation plaintiff.It has the foundation of theory and judicial practice, mainly analyzes and solves the problem of the qualification of social organization subject encountered in judicial practice, hoping to be helpful to the development of the theory and practice of environmental public interest litigation in our country.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D632.9;D922.68

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 傅沿;;困局与破解:我国环境公益诉讼成本分摊规则的功能主义审视[J];法律适用;2016年05期

2 蒋云飞;;论环境行政执法与刑事司法衔接中检察监督之完善——以最高检挂牌督办4起腾格里沙漠污染环境案为例[J];环境保护;2016年07期

3 李艳芳;吴凯杰;;论检察机关在环境公益诉讼中的角色与定位——兼评最高人民检察院《检察机关提起公益诉讼改革试点方案》[J];中国人民大学学报;2016年02期

4 侯佳儒;;环境公益诉讼的美国蓝本与中国借鉴[J];交大法学;2015年04期

5 张辉;;美国环境公众参与理论及其对中国的启示[J];现代法学;2015年04期

6 蔡守秋;;从环境权到国家环境保护义务和环境公益诉讼[J];现代法学;2013年06期

7 杨朝霞;;论环境公益诉讼的权利基础和起诉顺位——兼谈自然资源物权和环境权的理论要点[J];法学论坛;2013年03期

8 郑贤宇;;我国环境公益诉讼原告资格的完善[J];东南学术;2011年04期

9 吴卫星;;环境公益诉讼原告资格比较研究与借鉴——以美国、印度和欧盟为例[J];江苏行政学院学报;2011年03期

10 杨朝霞;;论环保机关提起环境民事公益诉讼的正当性——以环境权理论为基础的证立[J];法学评论;2011年02期

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 毛育军;我国环境公益诉讼原告资格问题研究[D];中南林业科技大学;2016年

2 王梦露;论NGO作为环境公益诉讼的原告资格[D];吉林大学;2016年

3 汤慧;环境公益诉讼原告适格问题研究[D];南京师范大学;2014年

4 刘艳霞;试论我国环境公益诉讼原告资格[D];吉林大学;2012年

5 王芳;公众参与环境保护理论与实践[D];西南交通大学;2008年



本文编号:1743561

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/1743561.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6c4ce***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com