失控的文本与失语的文学批评——以《史记》及其研究史为例

发布时间：2018-03-05 07:04

本文选题：《史记》　切入点：衍生型文本　出处：《中国社会科学》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：根据文本生成的不同方式,《史记》可分为司马迁独立创作的原生型文本和他根据既有文本编纂而成的衍生型文本。对于后者而言,司马迁通过各种形式的"钞撮",将来源驳杂、功能迥异的各类经传、诸子及谱牒文献"重写"为语体风格、叙事体例、价值立场大体一致的有序文本。在钞撮的过程中,难免在其文本嫁接处、补缀处或截取处稍存疏漏,在不同程度上留下了一些"失控的文本"。这些失控的文本展现了编钞者试图构建有序文本的过程及其所遭遇的困境,成为我们进入文本深层结构、了解编钞者文本编纂意图和方式的有效途径,也为我们对这一类型的文本展开文学批评提供了有益的视角。发现并对这些个案进行类型化研究,不仅有助于我们深入了解司马迁编纂《史记》的过程,也是我们认识这类衍生型文本文学价值的基础。
[Abstract]:According to the different ways in which the text is generated, the Records of the historian can be divided into the original text created independently by Si Maqian and the derivative text compiled by Si Maqian according to the existing text. For the latter, Si Maqian has mixed sources through various forms of "money pinch". "rewriting" of various kinds of classics and genealogical documents with very different functions is an orderly text with a style of style, narrative style, and generally consistent value stand. In the process of picking up banknotes, it is inevitable that there will be a slight omission in the grafted place, the patch place or the interception place of the banknote. To some extent, some "out of control text" is left. These runaway texts show the process of the banknote makers trying to build an orderly text and the difficulties encountered by them, and become the deep structure of the text. The effective way to understand the intention and the way of compiling the text of the banknote maker also provides a useful perspective for us to carry out literary criticism of this type of text. It is not only helpful for us to understand the process of Si Maqian's compilation of the Book of History, but also the basis for us to understand the literary value of this kind of derivative text.
【作者单位】：北京大学中文系;
【基金】：国家社科基金资助项目“汉代《洪范》五行学研究”(批准号14CZX022)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I207.5

【相似文献】