教育研究中的田野研究:研究方法还是方法论
发布时间：2018-12-15 02:00
【摘要】：田野研究到底算是一种研究方法,还是属于研究的方法论,不但在学生那里存在困惑,在研究者那里同样有着疑虑。研究方法强调的是资料收集与分析技术,并不会对整个研究的原则思之再三,且彼此间具有清晰的边界。而田野研究下辖多种研究方法,而且它强调的不仅是技术,更强调遵循整体性、长期性等研究原则,因此田野研究与研究方法之间存在明显的区别。人类学研究从书斋走向田野的转变是在实证主义方法论框架下完成的,而20世纪60年代开始对田野研究科学性的反思又体现了田野研究的基础、开始了从实证主义方法论向人文主义方法论过渡,这两次转变都表明田野研究与方法论也不可等同。要给田野研究一个合理的定位,需要打破"研究方法-方法论"的二元认识结构。田野研究属于"研究方法"和"方法论"之外的"路径范式",这一定位可以帮助教育学研究逐渐形成"范式思维",当然前提是我们不能将田野研究太过"神化"。
[Abstract]:Whether field research is a kind of research method or a research methodology, there are not only confusion among students, but also doubts among researchers. Research methods emphasize data collection and analysis techniques and do not think twice about the principles of the whole study and have clear boundaries with each other. The field research includes many kinds of research methods, and it emphasizes not only the technology, but also follows the research principles such as integrity and long-term, so there is a clear difference between the field research and the research methods. The change of anthropological research from study to field is completed under the framework of positivism methodology, and the reflection on the scientific nature of field study since 1960s reflects the foundation of field research. The transition from positivism methodology to humanism methodology shows that field research and methodology are not equal. In order to give a reasonable orientation to field research, it is necessary to break the dual cognitive structure of methodology. Field study belongs to the "path paradigm" outside of "research method" and "methodology", which can help pedagogy research to form "paradigm thinking" gradually. Of course, the premise is that we can not "deify" field research too much.
【作者单位】： 海南师范大学教育与心理学院;
【分类号】：G40-03
本文编号：2379741
[Abstract]:Whether field research is a kind of research method or a research methodology, there are not only confusion among students, but also doubts among researchers. Research methods emphasize data collection and analysis techniques and do not think twice about the principles of the whole study and have clear boundaries with each other. The field research includes many kinds of research methods, and it emphasizes not only the technology, but also follows the research principles such as integrity and long-term, so there is a clear difference between the field research and the research methods. The change of anthropological research from study to field is completed under the framework of positivism methodology, and the reflection on the scientific nature of field study since 1960s reflects the foundation of field research. The transition from positivism methodology to humanism methodology shows that field research and methodology are not equal. In order to give a reasonable orientation to field research, it is necessary to break the dual cognitive structure of methodology. Field study belongs to the "path paradigm" outside of "research method" and "methodology", which can help pedagogy research to form "paradigm thinking" gradually. Of course, the premise is that we can not "deify" field research too much.
【作者单位】： 海南师范大学教育与心理学院;
【分类号】：G40-03
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑茸;贾红杰;;田野研究及其对教育科研的启示[J];考试周刊;2007年02期
2 朱敏;;田野研究的扎根与扩展[J];理论界;2009年01期
3 顾尔伙;;教育传播学视角下田野研究质量提升探析[J];当代教育与文化;2013年05期
4 饶清强;;田野研究及其在教育科研中的应用[J];教书育人;2006年08期
5 纳钦;作用中的敖包信仰与传说——在珠腊沁村的田野研究[J];民族艺术;2004年04期
6 孔祥玉;;在田野研究中收获[J];基础教育课程;2007年12期
7 杨振峰;;满足学生多样化需求的学校体系与课程设置 美国南加州核桃谷学区各类学校的田野研究[J];上海教育;2013年02期
8 伍红林;;论基于教育学立场的教育田野研究——兼与人类学的比较[J];教育理论与实践;2008年28期
9 胡玉坤;;政治、身份认同与知识生产——嵌入权力之中的乡村田野研究[J];清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年03期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 中国社会科学院民族学与人类学所 牛锐;社会转型中的人类学田野研究[N];中国民族报;2007年
2 翁乃群;社会转型中的人类学田野研究[N];中国社会科学院院报;2006年
3 程明伟;“第三只眼”看医院[N];健康报;2011年
，本文编号：2379741
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulilunlunwen/2379741.html
