听评课中新手教师与经验教师评价的实证研究

发布时间：2019-06-01 10:28

【摘要】："听评课"是我国基础教育中校本教研的主要活动,也是教师专业发展的一种重要模式。自2004年起有关听评课的研究逐年增加,课堂观察和同僚评课的方法与效果受到广泛的关注。一些研究指出了听评课低效率的现象,但并未从实证角度解明这一问题的本质。该研究通过新手教师和经验教师的比较发现,新手和经验教师虽然在课堂观察后的定量评价上不存在显著差异,但质性评价差异较大。造成这一差异的原因在于新手教师缺少大量可用于对比的教学脚本和图式,新手教师和经验教师由于缺乏评课所需的理论知识,均不能对所评教学进行准确描述。这些实证结论表明,为了增强听评课的效果,还需要为教师提供有效的观察工具和理论知识。
[Abstract]:Listening and evaluating course is the main activity of school-based teaching and research in basic education in our country, and it is also an important mode of teachers' professional development. Since 2004, the research on listening and evaluating has increased year by year, and the methods and effects of classroom observation and colleague evaluation have received extensive attention. Some studies have pointed out the phenomenon of low efficiency of listening to and evaluating lessons, but have not explained the essence of this problem from an empirical point of view. Through the comparison between novice teachers and experienced teachers, it is found that although there is no significant difference in quantitative evaluation between novice and experienced teachers after classroom observation, there is a great difference in qualitative evaluation. The reason for this difference is that novice teachers lack a large number of teaching scripts and schemas that can be used for comparison. Novice teachers and experienced teachers can not accurately describe the evaluated teaching because of the lack of theoretical knowledge needed to evaluate classes. These empirical conclusions show that in order to enhance the effect of listening to and evaluating lessons, it is also necessary to provide teachers with effective observation tools and theoretical knowledge.
【作者单位】：华南师范大学教育信息技术学院;
【基金】：全国教育科学规划课题国家一般项目“信息技术支持的个性化和持续性教师专业发展模式研究”(项目编号:BCA170082)研究成果之一
【分类号】：G635.1

【相似文献】