大学教师的收入压缩——基于“2014中国大学教师调查”的实证分析

发布时间：2018-06-14 09:48

本文选题：大学教师 + 教龄　；参考：《复旦教育论坛》2016年06期

【摘要】：收入压缩指的是由非生产性因素导致的不同群体的员工之间应达到的收入差距未达到的现象。基于"2014中国大学教师调查"的数据,作者实证分析了多群体的大学教师收入问题。研究发现,中国大学不同工作年限的教师之间存在着显著的收入压缩,且教龄最长的教师组与教龄在6年内的教师组之间的收入压缩度最大。不同地域、学科和大学层次的教师群体的收入压缩度存在差异:西部高于东部和中部,社会科学高于人文科学、工学和理学,一般四年制本科大学高于"211工程"大学,但在"985工程"大学中,不同教龄教师组之间却存在着与收入压缩相反方向的"收入扩张",即由非生产性因素导致的长短教龄教师之间理应达到的收入差距得以扩大。
[Abstract]:Income compression refers to the phenomenon that the income gap between different groups of employees caused by non-productive factors is not reached. Based on the data of 2014 China University Teachers Survey, the author empirically analyzes the income of multi-group college teachers. It is found that there is significant income compression among teachers with different working years in Chinese universities, and the highest degree of income compression exists between the longest teaching group and the teacher group with six years of teaching age. There are differences in the degree of income compression among teachers in different regions, disciplines and universities: the west is higher than the eastern and central regions, the social sciences are higher than the humanities, engineering and science, and the four-year undergraduate universities are generally higher than the "211 Project" universities. However, in the "985 Project" university, there is a "income expansion" in the opposite direction of income compression among teachers of different teaching ages, that is, the income gap that should be achieved between teachers of long and long teaching years caused by non-productive factors can be enlarged.
【作者单位】：华中科技大学教育科学研究院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金资助项目“大学教师评价的效能研究——基于全国本科院校的调查”(项目编号:71273101)
【分类号】：G645.1

【相似文献】