成果类型视角下高校创新效率及影响因素研究
发布时间：2018-08-23 11:03
【摘要】：本文基于创新成果类型视角,将高校科技创新成果分为学术产出成果和经济产出成果,采用随机前沿模型对高校科技创新的学术产出效率、经济产出效率及其关键影响因素进行了探索性的研究。主要的研究发现有:(1)样本期内,高校的学术产出是投资驱动型的,学术产出成果的增加主要依靠RD资本经费的投入来实现;RD资本存量对高校经济产出效率具有负向影响,而适当增加RD活动人员有助于提升经济产出效率。(2)各省份高校之间的学术产出效率、经济产出效率存在明显差异,但都呈现东部最高、中部次之、西部最低的分布特征,表明高校的科技创新效率与当地的经济发展水平存在一定的关联程度。(3)加强高校的科技活动交流可以显著提升高校学术产出效率和经济产出效率;高校普遍偏重"数量"的考评制度使得RD人员素质和学术产出效率显著正相关,与经济产出效率非显著负相关;样本期间,加大政府经费支持力度不能有效提升学术产出效率。
[Abstract]:Based on the perspective of the types of innovation achievements, this paper divides the scientific and technological innovation achievements into academic output and economic output, and uses the stochastic frontier model to analyze the academic output efficiency of scientific and technological innovation in colleges and universities. The economic output efficiency and its key influencing factors were studied. The main findings are as follows: (1) in the sample period, the academic output of colleges and universities is investment-driven, and the increase of academic output mainly depends on the input of R D capital funds to realize that the R D capital stock has a negative impact on the economic output efficiency of colleges and universities. The appropriate increase of Rd activists is helpful to improve the efficiency of economic output. (2) there are obvious differences in the efficiency of academic output and economic output among colleges and universities in various provinces, but they all show the distribution characteristics of the highest in the east, the second in the middle, and the lowest in the west. It shows that the efficiency of scientific and technological innovation in colleges and universities has certain correlation with the level of local economic development. (3) strengthening the exchange of scientific and technological activities in colleges and universities can significantly improve the efficiency of academic output and economic output of colleges and universities; The evaluation system of "quantity" in colleges and universities generally makes R D personnel quality and academic output efficiency positively correlated, but not negatively correlated with economic output efficiency. During the sample period, increasing the support of government funds can not effectively improve the efficiency of academic output.
【作者单位】： 合肥工业大学管理学院;过程优化与智能决策教育部重点实验室;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金“产业转移中创新要素集聚模式及区域引导策略研究”(71303073,起止时间:2015.01-2017.12)
【分类号】：G644
本文编号：2198888
[Abstract]:Based on the perspective of the types of innovation achievements, this paper divides the scientific and technological innovation achievements into academic output and economic output, and uses the stochastic frontier model to analyze the academic output efficiency of scientific and technological innovation in colleges and universities. The economic output efficiency and its key influencing factors were studied. The main findings are as follows: (1) in the sample period, the academic output of colleges and universities is investment-driven, and the increase of academic output mainly depends on the input of R D capital funds to realize that the R D capital stock has a negative impact on the economic output efficiency of colleges and universities. The appropriate increase of Rd activists is helpful to improve the efficiency of economic output. (2) there are obvious differences in the efficiency of academic output and economic output among colleges and universities in various provinces, but they all show the distribution characteristics of the highest in the east, the second in the middle, and the lowest in the west. It shows that the efficiency of scientific and technological innovation in colleges and universities has certain correlation with the level of local economic development. (3) strengthening the exchange of scientific and technological activities in colleges and universities can significantly improve the efficiency of academic output and economic output of colleges and universities; The evaluation system of "quantity" in colleges and universities generally makes R D personnel quality and academic output efficiency positively correlated, but not negatively correlated with economic output efficiency. During the sample period, increasing the support of government funds can not effectively improve the efficiency of academic output.
【作者单位】： 合肥工业大学管理学院;过程优化与智能决策教育部重点实验室;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金“产业转移中创新要素集聚模式及区域引导策略研究”(71303073,起止时间:2015.01-2017.12)
【分类号】：G644
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 沈能;刘凤朝;;基于空间经济视角的大学知识创新效率的区域差异与趋同[J];数理统计与管理;2014年01期
2 沈能;;大学知识创新效率的测度与空间收敛分析[J];科学学与科学技术管理;2012年05期
3 苏涛永;高琦;;基于随机前沿分析的高校创新效率及差异研究[J];预测;2012年06期
4 钟瑞雯;方厚政;;基于DEA的高校创新效率研究[J];科技与管理;2014年02期
5 李清贤;曲绍卫;齐书宇;;教育部直属高校教师科技创新效率研究——基于2007～2011年Malmquist指数法的动态分析[J];高等工程教育研究;2014年03期
6 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 李秋月;基于省域视角的高校创新效率实证研究[D];南华大学;2015年
2 雷风搏;基于SFA方法的高校创新效率测评研究与对策建议[D];合肥工业大学;2016年
，本文编号：2198888
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/gaodengjiaoyulunwen/2198888.html
