大学生思维方式与应对方式的关系研究

发布时间：2018-09-06 08:29

【摘要】：运用思维方式问卷和应对方式问卷对663名大学生进行测试,旨在从文化视角探讨大学生思维方式的特点及其与应对方式的关系。结果表明:(1)大学生思维方式在专业、地域、年级等人口统计变量上存在显著差异:文科生思维的整体性显著高于理工科和艺术类;南方人思维的变化性显著高于北方人;大二学生思维的整体性显著高于大一和大三,大一思维的变化性显著高于大四年级。(2)思维方式对应对方式具有显著的预测作用。其中,协变性对积极应对正向作用显著、对消极应对中的自责和合理化负向作用显著;矛盾性对积极应对负向作用显著、对消极应对正向作用显著。思维的整体性和变化性针对性较强:整体性有助于解决问题的积极应对,变化性可有效避免自责、幻想、合理化的消极应对方式。
[Abstract]:663 college students were tested by thinking style questionnaire and coping style questionnaire. The purpose of this study was to explore the characteristics of thinking style and its relationship with coping style from the perspective of culture. The results show that: (1) there are significant differences in the way of thinking of college students in demographic variables such as specialty, region, grade and so on: the integrity of thinking of liberal arts students is significantly higher than that of science and engineering and art, the variability of thinking of southerners is significantly higher than that of northerners; The overall thinking of sophomore students is significantly higher than that of freshmen and junior students, and the variability of freshman thinking is significantly higher than that of senior grade. (2) thinking style has a significant predictive effect on coping style. Among them, covariance has significant positive effect on positive coping, significant negative effect on self-blame and rationalization of negative coping, contradiction on negative effect on positive coping and significant effect on negative positive coping. The wholeness and variability of thinking are more pertinence: the wholeness is helpful to solve the problem positively, the change can effectively avoid the negative coping style of self-blame, fantasy and rationalization.
【作者单位】：华南师范大学心理应用中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务研究项目资助(03JD880006)
【分类号】：B844.2

【参考文献】