伤害情境下青少年宽恕的发展研究

发布时间：2018-03-26 06:11

本文选题：伤害　切入点：情境　出处：《河北大学》2004年硕士论文

【摘要】：宽恕是近年来道德心理研究的重要主题之一。本研究在对宽恕的哲学渊源、宽恕的发展阶段、宽恕的过程模式、影响宽恕的因素和人际间宽恕的模式等内容总结的基础上，结合事件情境、同伴关系、年龄和性别等因素探讨青少年宽恕的发展。结果如下： (1) 故事情境对青少年的情感反应、知觉到的伤害程度和宽恕程度有显著效应，在名誉伤害和隐私伤害情境下的生气程度和知觉到的伤害程度最高，宽恕程度最低。 (2) 同伴类型对青少年的情感反应和宽恕程度有显著效应。青少年对好朋友的生气程度要低于对一般同学，在宽恕程度上对好朋友的宽恕程度要高于对一般同学的宽恕程度。 (3) 性别对青少年的情感反应、知觉到的伤害程度和宽恕程度没有显著效应，但在某些情境下存在显著的性别差异，如在名誉伤害情境下，女生的生气程度显著高于男生；在身体伤害情境下，女生的宽恕程度显著高于男生。 (4) 年级对青少年的情感反应、知觉到的伤害程度和宽恕程度没有显著效应，但在某些情境下存在显著的年级差异。 (5) 青少年的情感反应与知觉到的伤害程度有显著的正相关，但情感反应、知觉到的伤害程度与宽恕程度呈现显著的负相关。 (6) 青少年在伤害情境下对宽恕程度理由的解释上表现出年级上的显著差异。初二的学生倾向于从亲密性的角度解释，而高二的学生更多地从冒犯者的个性品质和道德要求的角度出发，，如“他的人品有问题”或“宽恕是一种美德”，而大二年级则主要以冒犯者犯过的意图作为道德推理的准则。 (7) 在某些伤害情境下，青少年对宽恕程度理由的解释表现出性别上的显著差异。男生比女生更可能从亲密性和严重性的角度进行解释。 (8) 青少年对宽恕程度理由的解释表现出同伴类型上的显著差异。对于好朋友倾向于考虑两者的亲密程度，而对于一般同学关系则较多地考虑事件的严重程度。 (9) 根据伤害事件的不同，青少年对宽恕程度理由的解释存在显著差异。
[Abstract]:Forgiveness is one of the most important topics in moral psychology research in recent years. This study summarizes the philosophical origin of forgiveness, the developing stage of forgiveness, the mode of forgiveness process, the factors affecting forgiveness and the mode of interpersonal forgiveness. The development of forgiveness in adolescents was explored in terms of event situations, peer relationships, age and gender. The results were as follows:. (1) the emotional response of the story situation to the adolescents, the perceived degree of injury and the degree of forgiveness have significant effects, and the degree of vitality and perceived injury in the context of injury to reputation and privacy is the highest, and the degree of forgiveness is the lowest. (2) Peer type had a significant effect on the emotional response and forgiveness degree of adolescents, the level of life to good friends was lower than that of normal classmates, and the forgiveness degree of good friends was higher than that of common classmates. (3) there was no significant effect of gender on adolescents' emotional reaction, perceived degree of injury and degree of forgiveness, but there were significant gender differences in some situations, such as in the context of reputation injury, girls' vitality was significantly higher than that of boys; The degree of forgiveness of girls was significantly higher than that of boys under the condition of physical injury. Grade 4) had no significant effect on adolescents' emotional reaction, perceived degree of injury and degree of forgiveness, but there were significant grade differences in some situations. (5) there was a significant positive correlation between emotional response and perceived degree of injury, but a significant negative correlation between emotional response, perceived degree of injury and degree of forgiveness. (6) adolescents showed significant differences in the explanation of forgiveness in injury situations. Junior two students tended to interpret it from an intimate perspective. The sophomore students are more likely to start from the point of view of the offender's personality and moral requirements, such as "his character is questionable" or "forgiveness is a virtue", while the sophomore is mainly based on the intention of the offender as the moral reasoning criterion. (7) in some harm situations, adolescents showed significant gender differences in explanation of forgiveness. Boys were more likely than girls to explain it from the perspective of intimacy and severity. (8) the explanation of forgiveness reason showed significant difference in peer type. For good friends, the degree of closeness was considered, but for the general relationship of classmates, the severity of the event was considered more. (9) there were significant differences in the explanation of forgiveness among adolescents according to injury events.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2004
【分类号】：B844.2

【引证文献】