高职生归因风格、应对方式与心理健康关系研究

发布时间：2018-05-20 11:02

本文选题：高职生 + 归因风格　；参考：《华东师范大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 近年来高职教育迅速发展,高职生心理健康研究越来越多的引起教育学和心理学研究者的重视,在众多影响心理健康的因素中,归因风格、应对方式具有独特的影响,考察归因风格、应对方式与心理健康的关系,不仅对于改善高职生归因风格、提高应对策略具有十分重要的意义,而且可以为高职院校的心理健康工作提供干预依据。本研究在文献研究的基础上,通过分层整群抽样的方法抽取宁德师范高等专科学校310名高职学生作为研究对象,采用多维度—多归因因果量表(MMCS)、应对方式问卷和症状自评量表(SCL90)作为测量工具,探讨高职生应对方式、归因风格和心理健康的关系。结果表明: (1)高职生心理健康水平整体上低于普通大学生常模,其中最明显的症状依次为强迫症状、人际关系敏感、焦虑和敌对;高职生心理健康水平有显著的文理、生源和年级差异,文科高职生在总分、强迫症状、人际交往敏感因子上得分显著高于理科生,城市高职生在躯体化、敌对、焦虑方面健康水平显著低于农村高职生,高年级学生心理健康水平显著低于低年级学生。 (2)高职生归因风格总体上与普通大学生一致,归因呈明显的内控倾向,倾向做出稳定的、内控的能力和努力归因,并且着重于对努力因素的归因,相对忽视能力因素,但对于人际失败的归因有外控趋势,并且归因风格存在显著的性别、生源、年级、独生与非独生子女差异,男生在人际交往归因比女生更倾向于做出能力归因和运气归因,理科学生比文科生在学业上倾向于做出能力归因,城市学生比农村学生在人际交往中更倾向于能力归因,农村学生比城市学生在学业上倾向于做出学运气归因,独生子女学生比非独生子女在人际交往中倾向于做出努力、情境归因。 (3)高职生总体上能够采用较成熟的应对方式,其顺序依次为:解决问题、求助、幻想、退避、合理化、自责,但相对于普通大学生更倾向于选择自责、退避的应对方式。高职生应对方式存在显著的性别、城乡、独生与非独生子女差异。男生比女生更多采用解决问题的应对方式,城市高职生比农村高职生更多采用求助、幻想、合理化的应对方式,独生子女比非独生子女能多采用求助应对方式。 (4)研究表明高职生归因风格、应对方式各因子与心理健康有密切的联系,其中归因风格中学业运气归因、人际努力归因、应对方式中解决问题、自责与心理健康关系最密切,四者对高职生心理健康的解释度达20.8%。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of higher vocational education in recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the study of mental health of vocational college students. Among the many factors affecting mental health, attribution style and coping style have a unique influence. The investigation of the relationship between attribution style, coping style and mental health is not only of great significance for improving the attribution style and coping strategies of vocational college students, but also provides the basis for intervention in the mental health work of higher vocational colleges. On the basis of literature study, 310 students of Ningde Teachers College were selected by stratified cluster sampling. Multi-dimensional-multi-attribution causality scale (MMCSA), coping style questionnaire and symptom Checklist 90 (SCL90) were used as measurement tools to explore the relationship between coping style, attribution style and mental health of vocational college students. The results show that: 1) the mental health level of higher vocational college students was lower than that of normal college students, and the most obvious symptoms were obsessive-compulsive symptoms, interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety and hostility. The scores of liberal arts students in total scores, compulsive symptoms and interpersonal sensitivity factors were significantly higher than those of science students, and the health level of urban higher vocational students in somatization, hostility and anxiety was significantly lower than that in rural higher vocational students. The mental health level of the senior students was significantly lower than that of the lower grade students. (2) the attribution style of higher vocational college students is consistent with that of ordinary college students in general. The attribution shows obvious tendency of internal control, tends to make stable, internal control ability and hard work attribution, and focuses on the attribution of effort factors, while neglecting the ability factors. However, the attribution of interpersonal failure has a trend of external control, and there are significant differences in attribution style between gender, student source, grade, single child and non-only child. Boys are more inclined to make ability attribution and luck attribution than girls in interpersonal attribution. Science students tend to make ability attribution academically, urban students are more inclined to ability attribution than rural students in interpersonal communication, rural students tend to make attribution of learning luck than urban students. Only-child students tend to make efforts and situational attribution in interpersonal communication than non-only children. (3) higher vocational students are able to adopt more mature coping styles in the following order: problem solving, seeking help, fantasy, avoidance, rationalization, self-accusation, but more inclined to choose the coping style of self-accusation and retreat than ordinary college students. There are significant gender, urban and rural differences between only child and non-only child in coping style of higher vocational college students. Boys more than girls use problem-solving coping styles, urban vocational students than rural vocational students more to use help, fantasy, rationalization of coping styles, one-child than non-only children can use more ways of coping. 4) the study shows that the factors of attribution style and coping style are closely related to mental health, among which academic luck attribution, interpersonal effort attribution, problem-solving in coping style, self-blame and mental health are the most closely related factors. The four students explained the psychological health of higher vocational students to 20.8B.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：B844.2

【参考文献】