学术腐败治理制度化研究

发布时间：2018-01-16 06:09

本文关键词：学术腐败治理制度化研究　出处：《山东大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：20世纪90年代,学术腐败问题日益严重,人们开始关注学术腐败现象,对学术腐败的讨论逐渐增多。进入21世纪,国家教育部、科技部等国家相关部门制定的预防和惩治学术腐败的规章,加上原来知识产权法的相关规定,对于学术腐败的治理起到了一定的作用。但学术腐败现象不仅没有减弱,相反愈演愈烈,大有星火燎原之势。学术腐败的案件层次越来越高,涉及的范围越来越大。究其原因,既有外部环境因素,如各高校的科研数量指标；监管的薄弱；也有内部原因,人心的浮躁,腐败的低成本与高收益等。学术腐败严重影响了学术创新能力的提升,影响了我国在国际上的学术创新竞争力,更重要地是对社会造成了极坏的影响。如何应对学术腐败这一社会毒瘤,用法律来规制无疑是最基础的手段。目前对于学术腐败的法律规制研究的文章比较少,且系统性和理论性不够,因此,有必要在梳理既有研究文献的基础上对预防和治理学术腐败的法律问题进行深入探究。本文共分五章,引言介绍论文的选题意义和研究方法；第一章对学术腐败的概念进行界定；第二章介绍学术腐败的历史与现状,考察了学术腐败发展的历史,并分析了学术腐败产生的原因；第三章介绍国外学术腐败治理的制度与经验,分析了美国、欧洲四个国家、亚洲的日本和韩国应对学术腐败的做法和经验；第四章介绍了我国学术腐败治理制度和实践,学术道德、学术自律、行业管理等在学术腐败预防和治理中的地位和作用；分析了我国学术腐败法律治理的现状和不足,并针对这种状况,对法律规制学术腐败现象进行了如何完善的思考；第五章是结语,对全文进行了总结,并指出论文的局限与不足。本论文的创新点在于,在梳理有关文献的基础上界定了学术腐败的概念,构建了广义的学术腐败的概念；在借鉴国外对学术腐败治理的经验和不违背国内有关法律法规规章的基础上构建了预防和治理学术腐败法律框架。其局限与不足是,占有的文献数量还不够丰富,第一手文献的资料较少；有些观点还欠斟酌,语言表述不够凝炼。
[Abstract]:In 1990s, the problem of academic corruption became more and more serious, people began to pay attention to the phenomenon of academic corruption, and the discussion of academic corruption gradually increased. The regulations on the prevention and punishment of academic corruption formulated by the Ministry of Science and Technology and other relevant state departments, together with the relevant provisions of the original intellectual property Law. For the governance of academic corruption has played a certain role. But the phenomenon of academic corruption not only has not weakened, on the contrary, become increasingly fierce, there is a great potential to start a prairie fire. The level of cases of academic corruption is getting higher and higher. The reason is that there are external environmental factors, such as the scientific research quantity index of colleges and universities; Weak regulation; There are internal reasons, impetuous people, low cost and high income of corruption. Academic corruption seriously affects the improvement of academic innovation ability and the competitiveness of our country in the international academic innovation. More importantly, it has a very bad impact on the society. How to deal with the social cancer of academic corruption, legal regulation is undoubtedly the most basic means. At present, there are few articles on the legal regulation of academic corruption. Therefore, it is necessary to probe into the legal problems of preventing and controlling academic corruption on the basis of combing the existing research literature. This paper is divided into five chapters, the introduction introduces the significance of the topic and research methods; The first chapter defines the concept of academic corruption; The second chapter introduces the history and present situation of academic corruption, examines the history of academic corruption development, and analyzes the causes of academic corruption. The third chapter introduces the system and experience of the management of academic corruption in foreign countries, and analyzes the practices and experiences of the United States, four European countries, Japan and Korea in Asia in dealing with academic corruption. Chapter 4th introduces the status and role of academic corruption management system and practice, academic morality, academic self-discipline and industry management in the prevention and management of academic corruption. This paper analyzes the current situation and shortcomings of the legal governance of academic corruption in China, and in view of this situation, gives some thoughts on how to perfect the legal regulation of the phenomenon of academic corruption; Chapter 5th is the conclusion, summarizes the full text, and points out the limitations and shortcomings of the paper. The innovation of this paper lies in the definition of the concept of academic corruption on the basis of combing the relevant literature, and the construction of the broad concept of academic corruption; On the basis of drawing lessons from the experience of foreign countries on the management of academic corruption and not violating the relevant domestic laws and regulations, the legal framework of preventing and controlling academic corruption is constructed. Its limitation and deficiency are that the quantity of literature is not rich enough, and the firsthand literature is less; some viewpoints are not considered, and the language is not condensed enough.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G644;G322

【参考文献】