高等教育滞胀率测度及应用研究

发布时间：2018-03-22 12:10

本文选题：高等教育　切入点：教育滞胀率　出处：《湖南师范大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：.目前,针对我国高等教育发展中出现的教育病理现象,已有相关学者从经济学角度上提出了高等教育滞胀理论用来解释和说明。本文认为衡量教育滞胀的程度即高等教育滞胀率,主要在于测度高等教育效益、效率、质量和机制等四个方面的负面程度。现阶段关于高等教育滞胀率的研究还处于探索阶段,之前的学者主要是对高等教育滞胀理论和影响因素进行解释或分析。本文在结合多类学科知识的基础上,运用了文献、计量以及实证等研究方法,理论结合实际,对高等教育的病理情况从效益、效率、质量以及信息机制四个维度进行了系统的研究与分析。首先,对高等教育四个维度进行了相关理论的阐述,根据其各自的特点选取了适用的测度方法。接着,对以往学者的相关研究比较分析后,构建出高等教育滞胀测度的各维度指标体系。该体系包括从高等教育全过程出发的基于DEA的效益和效率的投入产出指标体系,以及分析高等教育教学与管理的整个体系和教育质量与教育信息机制的评估指标体系。本文对于测度指标的择取考虑到了指标的全面性、可行性以及实际应用性等原则。在这基础上,建立起高等教育滞胀率综合模型。最后,以中国的31个省份为实证研究对象,分析各省份高等教育四个维度的负面问题,从而计算出中国各省市的教育滞涨率。结果表明我国暂时未有省份出现教育滞胀,但大多省份都处于橙色预警阶段,说明我国教育的发展已出现明显的问题有待解决。本文通过动态的DEA模型和静态的高等教育评估模型两者相结合,构建出高等教育滞胀综合模型。高等教育滞胀测度研究具有重要意义,通过了解各个省份的运行效率和教育公平状况,能衡量高等教育病理的程度,有利于相关教育机构把握高等教育的运行,为引导高等教育优质均衡发展提供指导方向。
[Abstract]:At present, in view of the educational pathological phenomena in the development of higher education in China, Some scholars have put forward the theory of stagflation in higher education from the angle of economics to explain and explain it. This paper holds that the degree of the stagflation of higher education, that is, the stagflation rate of higher education, mainly lies in the measurement of the benefit and efficiency of higher education. The negative degree of quality and mechanism. The current research on stagflation rate of higher education is still in the exploratory stage. Previous scholars mainly explain or analyze the theory and influencing factors of stagflation in higher education. The quantitative and empirical research methods, combining theory with practice, systematically study and analyze the pathological situation of higher education from four dimensions: benefit, efficiency, quality and information mechanism. This paper expounds the four dimensions of higher education, and selects the suitable measurement methods according to their respective characteristics. The index system of every dimension of the measurement of stagflation in higher education is constructed, which includes the input-output index system based on the benefit and efficiency of DEA from the whole process of higher education. It also analyzes the whole system of teaching and management of higher education and the evaluation index system of educational quality and educational information mechanism. Based on the principles of feasibility and practical application, a comprehensive model of stagflation rate of higher education is established. Finally, taking 31 provinces of China as the empirical research object, the negative problems of four dimensions of higher education in each province are analyzed. The results show that there are no provinces in China, but most of the provinces are in the orange early warning stage, indicating that there are obvious problems to be solved in the development of education in China. Through the combination of dynamic DEA model and static evaluation model of higher education, this paper constructs a comprehensive model of stagflation in higher education. By understanding the operating efficiency and educational fairness of each province, we can measure the degree of pathology of higher education, help the relevant educational institutions to grasp the operation of higher education, and provide guidance for guiding the balanced development of higher education quality.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G647

【参考文献】