国内外开放课程的交互距离的对比研究
[Abstract]:The opening and sharing of educational resources has become a growing international phenomenon. It is also a strategic choice for higher education institutions to promote the further development of educational information and to realize educational innovation. As a large-scale educational resource opening and sharing project, the MIT Open Courseware Movement is the pioneer and the driving force of the Open Education Resources Movement, and its successful experience is worthy of reference by our country's national fine courses. The biggest difference between distance education and traditional education is that teachers and students are separated in time and space. This makes the distance between teachers and students, students and textbooks in distance education. Therefore, the most important thing in the open course is to shorten the interaction distance as far as possible. Therefore, this study selects two representatives from inside and outside of the open education resource movement, namely, the open courseware project of MIT and the national fine course construction project of our country, to analyze and compare the interactive distance between the two. This paper summarizes their advantages and disadvantages, and puts forward some suggestions on the construction of fine courses in China. In this study, literature research, comparative research and other methods as the main research methods. First of all, the research status of open courses at home and abroad is introduced. Through the analysis and study of Moore's theory of interaction distance, five factors influencing the distance are summarized, which are individual and group educational thought, educational concept and organization thought, students' and teachers' personality and affective characteristics, and so on. The subject nature and content of the course, the mandatory rules and limitations of educational institutions and environmental factors and the communication media of choice. Then, through the analysis of the current literature and the research of open courses at home and abroad, the author makes a comparative analysis of the five factors that affect the interaction distance between the national quality courses and the open courses of Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Finally, on the basis of the comparative conclusion, the author puts forward the further thinking about the construction project of national fine course in our country. It is pointed out that the national excellent curriculum construction project in our country should uphold the educational concept of opening and sharing, lighten the burden of teachers, improve the efficiency of course release, attach importance to process evaluation, expand resources and promote students' better understanding. Add a variety of interactive media; provide students with more interactive platforms.
【学位授予单位】:河南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:G649.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈劲新;;我国国家精品课程网络资源微观建设之研究——美国MITOCW项目建设的启示[J];成才之路;2008年28期
2 李桦;;MIT的开放式课程建设及其启示[J];重庆广播电视大学学报;2010年02期
3 肖君;网上教学资源支持服务系统的建设[J];中国远程教育;2003年05期
4 肖新发;网络教育的模式建构[J];中国远程教育;2003年13期
5 艾伦·泰特,陈垄;开放和远程教育中学生学习支持之理念与模式[J];中国远程教育;2003年15期
6 严继昌;思考资源建设[J];中国远程教育;2003年18期
7 王龙;麻省理工学院开放课件项目执行报告概要及评述[J];中国远程教育;2005年08期
8 王龙;;创新推广理论视角下的麻省理工学院开放课件项目[J];中国远程教育;2008年01期
9 王爱华;汪琼;;精品课程与国外开放课程共享利用的对比研究[J];中国远程教育;2010年06期
10 吴中江;我国现代远程教育信息传递模式研究[J];电化教育研究;2002年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 汤益芳;美国高校整合网络教学资源模式研究[D];南京师范大学;2005年
2 王龙;中国高等教育精品课程资源共建共享的现状、问题、对策与相关分析[D];首都师范大学;2006年
3 田甜;远程开放教育中艺术设计专业教学模式研究[D];湖南师范大学;2007年
4 吴美娇;国家精品课程与MIT OCW开放教育资源比较研究[D];江西师范大学;2009年
本文编号:2388808
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/2388808.html