高中生父亲教养方式、自我价值感与人际信任的关系研究
本文选题:高中生 + 父亲教养方式 ; 参考:《河北师范大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:近年来国内学者关于父母教养方式与人际信任的研究已经取得了很多研究成果,而对高中生这一群体的研究并不多见。此外,已有的研究中很少见到自我价值感因素的介入。本研究将探索高中生父亲教养方式、自我价值感及人际信任三者之间的关系,以及父亲教养方式这一环境因素能否通过自我价值感这一个体因素作用于高中生的人际信任。 本研究随机选取廊坊市三所普通高中高一至高三的527名学生为研究对象,采用父亲教养方式量表、青少年自我价值感量表及信任量表作为研究工具。利用相关统计手段考察高中生的父亲教养方式、自我价值感及人际信任的特点,分析他们之间的关系,研究得出结论如下: (1)父亲教养方式的惩罚严厉、过分干涉、拒绝否认和过度保护四个维度均存在显著的性别差异,男生得分显著高于女生得分,即男生比女生更多感受到父亲的惩罚、严厉、过分干涉、拒绝否认和过度保护这些消极的教养方式,父亲情感温暖理解这一维度性别差异不显著;父亲惩罚严厉这一维度在是否独生子女这一变量上存在显著差异,非独生子女得分显著高于独生子女;城市非独生子女在父亲偏爱被试这一维度得分显著高于农村非独生子女。 (2)自我价值感中的社会取向人际自我价值感和个人取向心理自我价值感两个维度存在显著的性别差异,男生得分显著高于女生;社会取向人际自我价值感和社会取向心理自我价值感在是否独生子女这一变量上存在显著差异,独生子女在这两个维度得分显著高于非独生子女;班干部在自我价值感各维度(除个人取向家庭自我价值感、个人取向人际自我价值感和社会取向道德自我价值感)得分均显著高于非班干部;城市学生的个人取向道德自我价值感要显著高于农村学生。 (3)高中生的人际信任在年级上存在显著差异,高二和高三学生的人际信任水平均显著高于高一学生。 (4)高中生父亲教养方式、自我价值感与人际信任两两之间存在显著的相关关系。父亲积极的教养方式与自我价值感和人际信任呈显著正相关,父亲消极的教养方式与自我价值感及人际信任呈显著负相关。 (5)高中生父亲的教养方式、自我价值感对人际信任有着显著的预测作用,,其中父亲情感温暖理解、个人取向一般自我价值感对高中生的人际信任有正向预测作用,父亲过度保护对高中生的人际信任有负向预测作用。 (6)高中生的自我价值感在父亲教养方式与人际信任之间起中介作用。即父亲教养方式通过自我价值感影响高中生的人际信任。
[Abstract]:In recent years, domestic scholars on parental rearing style and interpersonal trust research has made a lot of research results, but high school students this group of research is rare. In addition, the involvement of self-worth factors is rarely seen in existing studies. This study will explore the relationship among father rearing style, self-worth and interpersonal trust in senior high school students, as well as whether the environmental factor of father rearing style can affect the interpersonal trust of high school students through the individual factor of self-worth. In this study, 527 students from three senior high schools in Langfang City were randomly selected as the research objects. The father rearing style scale, the adolescents' self-worth scale and the trust scale were used as the research tools. Using the relevant statistical methods to investigate the characteristics of high school students' parenting style, self-worth and interpersonal trust, and to analyze the relationship between them, the conclusions are as follows: (1) there were significant gender differences in the punishment of father's upbringing style, excessive interference, denial of denial and over-protection. The scores of boys were significantly higher than those of girls, that is, boys felt the punishment of fathers more severely than girls. Too much interference, refusal to deny and over-protect these negative upbringing styles, the gender difference in the dimension of father's emotional warmth and understanding is not significant, and there is significant difference in whether the only child is the only child in the dimension of severe punishment of father. The score of non-only child was significantly higher than that of only child, and that of urban non-only child was significantly higher than that of rural non-only child in the dimension of father preference. 2) there were significant gender differences in social orientation, interpersonal self-worth and personal orientation psychological self-worth, and the scores of boys were significantly higher than those of girls; There are significant differences between social orientation interpersonal self-worth and social orientation psychological self-worth in the variable of "only child", the score of only child in these two dimensions is significantly higher than that of non-only child; The scores of class cadres in all dimensions of self-worth (except personal orientation family self-worth personal orientation interpersonal self-worth and social orientation moral self-worth) were significantly higher than that of non-class cadres. The sense of personal moral self-worth of urban students is significantly higher than that of rural students. (3) the interpersonal trust of senior high school students was significantly different in grade, and the interpersonal trust level of senior two and three students was significantly higher than that of senior one students. 4) there is a significant correlation between father rearing style, self-worth and interpersonal trust in high school students. The positive parenting style of the father was positively correlated with the sense of self-worth and interpersonal trust, while the negative parenting style of the father was negatively correlated with the sense of self-worth and interpersonal trust. 5) the father's upbringing style of senior high school students, the sense of self-worth has a significant predictive effect on interpersonal trust, in which the father's emotion is warm and understanding, and the personal orientation's general sense of self-worth can positively predict the interpersonal trust of high school students. Over protection of fathers has a negative predictive effect on high school students' interpersonal trust. 6) self-worth of high school students plays an intermediary role between parenting style and interpersonal trust. That is, the father's parenting style affects high school students' interpersonal trust through their sense of self-worth.
【学位授予单位】:河北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:G635.5;G444
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 曾宇霞;戴晓阳;;儿童同伴信任对自我意识的影响[J];中国儿童保健杂志;2008年01期
2 张松;父母教育方式对儿童社会性发展的影响[J];黑龙江教育学院学报;1999年02期
3 贾蕊;;高中生父母养育方式与人际信任的相关研究[J];黑龙江教育学院学报;2010年06期
4 王志梅;初中生父母教养方式的调查研究[J];河北师范大学学报(教育科学版);2003年06期
5 刘华山;社会变革中的中国人育子观念初析[J];华中师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1996年04期
6 王蕾;父母教养方式对中学生自我价值感的影响[J];健康心理学杂志;2000年05期
7 李彦章;父母教养方式影响因素的研究[J];健康心理学杂志;2001年02期
8 孟育群,宋学文;父亲淡出家庭教育与父爱的作用[J];教育科学;1998年04期
9 何德宽;;家庭结构在家庭教育中的作用[J];教育理论与实践;1986年03期
10 杨晓莉;李一茗;邹泓;;儿童、青少年人际信任的研究述评[J];宁波大学学报(教育科学版);2008年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 杨烨;自我价值感二维模型的理论架构与实证研究[D];北京大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 余舒;父亲教养行为及与2-6岁幼儿社会性行为的关系研究[D];华东师范大学;2011年
2 滕秋玲;父亲教养方式对高中生考试焦虑的相关研究[D];宁波大学;2011年
3 赵玉奇;高中生父亲教养方式与自尊、主观幸福感的关系研究[D];河北大学;2011年
4 付云岭;大学生父亲教养方式、心理一致感和自尊的关系研究[D];河北师范大学;2011年
5 芦朝霞;中学生父母教养方式、自我价值感与学业成绩的关系研究[D];山西大学;2005年
6 李龙辉;父母教养方式与高中生人际信任及自尊的相关研究[D];湖南师范大学;2006年
7 许岩;城市父亲参与儿童教养的影响因素[D];山东师范大学;2006年
8 赵岩;父亲教养方式与青少年内隐问题行为相关的元分析研究[D];河北师范大学;2006年
9 张欣华;中职生社会信任及其与自我价值感的相关研究[D];西南大学;2009年
10 王芹;职中幼教专业女生父亲教养方式、安全感与依恋关系的研究[D];河北师范大学;2009年
本文编号:1776615
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/wangluojiaoyulunwen/1776615.html