中芬现行小学母语课程标准比较研究
[Abstract]:In order to seize the opportunity of international competition and development, most countries in the end of the 20th century conceived and launched the basic education curriculum reform aimed at training future talents. Although the curriculum reform of basic education in different countries is based on different national conditions and the measures of curriculum reform are different, all countries are in the same era and face almost the same opportunities and challenges. Through the analysis and comparison of the Chinese Curriculum Standard of compulsory Education in China (2011 edition) and the National Core Curriculum of basic Education in Finland (2004), the article draws on the weakness of each other and contributes a little to the further development of the curriculum standard of our country. By combing the Chinese Curriculum Standard for compulsory Education (2011 Edition) and Finland's National Core Curriculum for basic Education (2004), the author translated and sorted out Finland's National Core Curriculum for basic Education (2004). This paper makes a comparative study of the current mother tongue curriculum standards in primary schools between China and Finland, drawing on each other's strengths and learning from each other. In the introduction part, the author summarizes the current research and research status of the current primary school mother tongue curriculum standards at home and abroad, and introduces the research methods of this paper. In the first chapter, the author analyzes and compares the background of the development of Chinese and Finnish primary school mother tongue curriculum standards, and finds that Finland attaches importance to the use of computers and the Internet by students, and Finnish primary school mother tongue curriculum standards permeate the emphasis on media literacy. Emphasis should be placed on cultivating students' ability of information retrieval and collation and the basic abilities of students in the information age. In the second to fourth chapters, the analysis and comparison of the current mother tongue curriculum standards of primary schools in China and Finland is the focus of this paper, including three main contents, namely, the analysis and comparison of the general framework and value orientation of the current primary school mother tongue curriculum standards in China and Finland; The analysis and comparison of the objectives of mother tongue curriculum in primary schools in China and Finland, and the analysis and comparison of the evaluation recommendations in the current curriculum standards of mother tongue in primary schools in China and Finland. Through comparison, it is found that the Finnish curriculum standard is concrete and diversified; the Finnish evaluation proposal is integrated with information technology; the Finnish evaluation system is perfect, and the operation is strong. The curriculum standards of both countries emphasize the importance of reading skills; the evaluation of Chinese curriculum standards highlights the characteristics of Chinese; the evaluation system of both countries embodies the integrity and comprehensive principles of curriculum evaluation. Therefore, in the part of reflection and reference, this paper puts forward that the Chinese curriculum standards in China should pay attention to three points: the curriculum content should be further concretized, the curriculum objectives should strengthen the attention to the media literacy; Try to develop a variety of curriculum standards to adapt to the differences between students. With the development of society and the change of times, the pace of curriculum reform will become more and more vigorous, and the reform of curriculum standards will have a long way to go. Only on the basis of maintaining characteristics and absorbing the essence of other countries' curriculum standard reform, can our curriculum standard go further and further on the road of reform.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:G623.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 雷实;国外母语课程标准的基本理念[J];语文建设;2001年10期
2 徐鹏;郑国民;;国外母语课程发展的动态及趋势[J];河北师范大学学报(教育科学版);2011年02期
3 张毅;;在母语课程的源流中重新审视课程目标的取向——兼与徐林祥、杨九俊二位先生商榷[J];课程.教材.教法;2014年01期
4 罗丽华;;美国加州八年级《母语课程标准》[J];语文教学与研究;2009年20期
5 彭光宇;;母语课程还是该叫“国文”[J];湖南教育(中);2010年04期
6 张毅;;呼唤母语课程的重新命名——关于我国母语课程命名的考证与思考[J];语文学习;2013年01期
7 康海燕;谢利民;;中美母语课程标准评价体系比较[J];教育科学研究;2009年08期
8 马铭;;我国与美国加州八年级母语课程标准之比较[J];科教导刊(中旬刊);2014年01期
9 潘涌;;各国母语课程与教学的若干特点[J];教育科学研究;2006年09期
10 韩雪屏;;当代国外母语课程知识状况[J];全球教育展望;2007年08期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 商报记者 王东;江苏教育社学术精品工程启动[N];中国图书商报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 张婷婷;中加初中母语课程标准对比研究[D];四川师范大学;2015年
2 时文华;中国与新西兰现行小学母语课程标准的比较研究[D];扬州大学;2015年
3 朱莹;中韩小学现行母语课程标准比较研究[D];扬州大学;2015年
4 刘欢;中芬现行小学母语课程标准比较研究[D];扬州大学;2015年
5 陈蕾;现行中南小学母语课程标准的比较研究[D];扬州大学;2015年
6 吕培;中爱现行小学母语课程标准比较研究[D];扬州大学;2015年
7 郭海萍;中澳两国小学母语课程标准比较研究[D];扬州大学;2013年
8 陆梦f3;中美小学母语课程标准写作部分的比较研究[D];扬州大学;2014年
9 雷芳;汉语母语课程定名研究[D];湖南师范大学;2005年
10 杨益斌;中美母语课程标准小学写作部分的比较研究[D];湖南师范大学;2012年
,本文编号:2390120
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/xiaoxuejiaoyu/2390120.html