学科自信心与满意度——中国比较教育学科成员的现状调查

发布时间：2018-01-26 10:32

本文关键词： 中国比较教育比较教育学科成员学科形象与危机现状调查　出处：《比较教育研究》2015年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：对比较教育学科的研究应该包括至今受忽视的对比较教育学科成员的研究。为了解中国比较教育学科成员的工作现状和对比较教育的看法,本研究选取比较教育学分会第十七届年会的参会者进行了问卷调查。调查发现,超过82%的受调查者对比较教育的作用高度认可,超过72%的人对其未来发展表现出乐观主义的态度。不过,仅有39.5%的人对我国比较教育学界目前整体的研究现状感到满意。此外,比较教育学科成员的看法存在着群体差异。就对学科作用和发展前景的评价而言,博士生和教授群体是肯定的乐观主义者,而副教授群体则是保守的犹疑者。就国内学界整体的研究现状而言,教授群体中满意者比例最高,而副教授群体中满意者比例最低。
[Abstract]:The research on the subject of comparative education should include the research on the members of the subject of comparative education which has been neglected so far, in order to understand the present situation of the work of the members of comparative education in China and their views on comparative education. This study selected participants of the 17th Annual Conference of Comparative Education Branch to conduct a questionnaire survey. The survey found that more than 82% of the respondents highly approve of the role of comparative education. More than 72% people are optimistic about their future development. However, only 39.5% are satisfied with the current situation of the overall research in the field of comparative education in China. There are group differences in the views of the members of comparative education disciplines. In terms of the evaluation of the role and development prospects of the subjects, the doctoral and professor groups are positive optimists. The group of associate professors is conservative and hesitant. In terms of the overall research situation in domestic academic circles, the proportion of satisfied professors is the highest, and the proportion of contented among associate professors is the lowest.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学国际与比较教育研究院;
【分类号】：G40-059.3
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出对学科自身进行研究和反思是一个学科走向成熟的标志和途径。比较教育学作为一门新兴学科,因为对其研究对象、理论和方法尚未形成共识,且不断要为自己存在的合法性进行辩护,[1]所以,对学科自身进行反思和研究的需要尤为迫切。目前,这方面的文章和著作在国内外已

【共引文献】