政治经济学批判与形而上学批判的统一——《哲学的贫困》对价值的二律背反的批判

发布时间：2018-04-10 23:11

本文选题：价值 + 二律背反　；参考：《教学与研究》2017年05期

【摘要】：《哲学的贫困》中有关价值的二律背反的批判,最为突出并具体地呈现了历史唯物主义原则的应用。一方面历史唯物主义原则贯穿于二律背反的批判;另一方面也体现了马克思将政治经济学批判与形而上学批判相统一的立场。因此,理解马克思对蒲鲁东价值的二律背反的批判就具有了双重意义:一是理解马克思历史唯物主义原则之最初应用的钥匙;二是探究政治经济学批判与形而上学批判何以具有统一的基础。由此,理解马克思对价值的二律背反的批判就引出了三个对象:蒲鲁东的思想体系、国民经济学家的价值理论以及黑格尔的形而上学,前者是要试图达到后两者的合题,而后两者站在了相同的形而上学立场,马克思批判的任务是以历史唯物主义的基本原则为基础,实现对三者的彻底的批判。
[Abstract]:The criticism against the two laws of value in Poverty of philosophy is the most prominent and concrete application of the principle of historical materialism.On the one hand, the principle of historical materialism runs through the criticism of "two laws against"; on the other hand, it also embodies Marx's position of unifying the critique of political economy and metaphysics.Therefore, it is of double significance to understand Marx's criticism against the value of Buluton: first, to understand the key to the initial application of Marx's principle of historical materialism;The second is to explore the political economy criticism and metaphysical criticism on the basis of unity.Therefore, the understanding of Marx's criticism of the two laws against value leads to three objects: the thought system of Poulidon, the value theory of national economists and Hegel's metaphysics, the former trying to achieve the combination of the latter two.The latter two stand on the same metaphysical standpoint. Marx's task of criticizing them is based on the basic principles of historical materialism to realize a thorough critique of the three.
【作者单位】：中共上海市委党校哲学教研部;
【分类号】：F0-0;F014.31

【相似文献】