论资本的核心逻辑与附属逻辑

发布时间：2018-08-18 19:50

【摘要】：学界将创造文明和价值增殖看作资本的双重逻辑。然而,资本不仅具有创造文明的逻辑,而且存在与之相反的摧毁文明的逻辑。摧毁文明逻辑和价值增殖逻辑并不相同。价值增殖的逻辑必然同时衍生出创造文明和摧毁文明这两种对立的逻辑,并牢固地支配它们的运作。资本在运动中还呈现出提高效率逻辑与降低效率逻辑、竞争逻辑与垄断逻辑、公共性逻辑与私独性逻辑等诸多相互矛盾的正向逻辑和负向逻辑。但这两类逻辑都由价值增殖逻辑所规约,并服从和服务于价值增殖逻辑。唯有价值增殖逻辑是资本的核心逻辑,其他逻辑都只是资本的附属逻辑。资本核心逻辑和附属逻辑的分野,在理论上有助于深化对资本逻辑与现代世界之矛盾性的理解;在实践上启示现代民众特别是当代中国合理对待资本及其逻辑,建构更高文明形态。
[Abstract]:Scholars regard creating civilization and value multiplication as the dual logic of capital. However, capital has not only the logic of creating civilization, but also the logic of destroying civilization. The logic of destroying civilization is not the same as the logic of value proliferation. The logic of value multiplication inevitably gives rise to the two opposing logic of creating and destroying civilization, and firmly dominates their operation. In the movement of capital, there are many contradictory positive and negative logic, such as the logic of improving efficiency and decreasing efficiency, the logic of competition and monopoly, the logic of publicity and the logic of private independence. But these two kinds of logic are regulated by the value multiplication logic, and serve the value multiplication logic. Only the logic of value multiplication is the core logic of capital, and the other logic is only the subsidiary logic of capital. The distinction between capital core logic and subsidiary logic is helpful to deepen the understanding of the contradiction between capital logic and modern world in theory, enlighten modern people, especially contemporary China, to treat capital and its logic in practice. To construct a higher form of civilization.
【作者单位】：北方工业大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“20世纪中国传统哲学与马克思主义哲学、西方哲学关系研究”[项目编号:13&ZD056] 北京师范大学“中国化马克思主义理论研究与教育宣传协同创新中心”项目“中国精神与中国文化研究”的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：F091.91

【相似文献】