探析“供给侧”经济学派所经历的两轮“否定之否定”——对“供给侧”学派的评价、学理启示及立足于中国的研讨展望
发布时间:2018-03-21 13:37
本文选题:萨伊定律 切入点:经济学派 出处:《财政研究》2014年08期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:本文梳理了"供给侧"经济学派的发展中已呈现出的两轮"否定之否定"演变轨迹。第一轮"否定之否定"的表象为:萨伊定律—凯恩斯主义—供给学派;第二轮"否定之否定"的表象为:供给学派—凯恩斯主义复辟—供给管理。在此发展规律的基础上,本文论述对"供给侧"学派的评价、相关的学理启示及展望。评价方面主要包括两大内容:第一,对"萨伊定律"及把萨伊归为代表人物之一的"庸俗经济学"的评价。包括从历史视角对其重要意义的认识,西斯蒙第对自由放任价值观的批评,马尔萨斯需求管理思想与其的分歧,凯恩斯对其的条件性否定,以及马克思基于"劳动产品价值量"、"三位一体"公式和唯物史观引出的对于资产阶级"庸俗经济学"的批评。第二,对"供给学派"的评价。通过总结供给学派的主要观点及重审该学派内部的分歧,总结学界对其的批评和该学派在理论联系实践中的得失。接着,在阐述"供给侧"学派两轮"否定之否定"所给出的启示后,我们关于"供给侧"学派的展望,是推出从对立走向融合的、根植于中国实践对"理性供给管理"诉求的"新供给经济学",认为这恰是从发展逻辑上构成"供给侧"学派的理性回归,并论述了其"求真务实"的特征、"建设性包容否定"的方式以及赋予"复辟"浪潮的从基础理论到政策主张的创新色彩。
[Abstract]:This paper reviews the evolution of "negative negation" in the development of "supply-side" economic school. The appearance of the first "negative negation" is as follows: Say's law-Keynesian-supply school; The appearance of the second round of "negation of negation" is: supply school-Keynesian restoration-supply management. On the basis of this development law, this paper discusses the evaluation of "supply-side" school. The evaluation mainly includes two aspects: first, the evaluation of Say's law and vulgar economics, which classifies him as one of the representative figures, including the understanding of its significance from the historical perspective. Cismonti's criticism of laissez-faire, Malthus's thought of demand management and his differences, Keynes's conditional negation of it. And Marx's criticism of bourgeois "vulgar economics" based on "labor product value", "trinity" formula and historical materialism. By summing up the main viewpoints of the school of supply and reviewing the differences within the school, the author summarizes the criticism of the school and the gain and loss of the school in theory and practice. After expounding the enlightenment given by the two rounds of "negative negation" of the "supply-side" school, our outlook on the "supply-side" school is put forward from opposition to integration. Rooted in the Chinese practice of "New supply Economics" for "rational supply management", it is considered that this is the rational return of the "supply-side" school, which is formed logically from the perspective of development. It also discusses its characteristics of "seeking truth and pragmatism", the way of "constructive tolerance and negation" and the innovative color from basic theory to policy proposition that endows the wave of "restoration".
【作者单位】: 财政部财政科学研究所;
【分类号】:F091.352.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈维辰;;论供给学派的经济理论与实践[J];北京轻工业学院学报;1987年01期
2 张弥;国内外供给经济学派理论研究的比较[J];财经问题研究;1999年04期
3 贾康,江旭东;积极运用财政政策加强供给管理——论财政政策促进供求关系中长期均衡和国民经济跨世纪发展的思路[J];财政研究;1999年03期
4 李义平;需求管理与供给管理——宏观经济管理的两种模式及其理论基础[J];中国工业经济;1999年12期
5 杨林枫;;费尔德斯坦与供给经济学派[J];江西财经学院学报;1987年05期
6 郭熙保;;从需求经济学到供给经济学——供给学派述评[J];湖南社会科学;1989年05期
7 唐岳驹;;费尔德斯坦及其“供给学派”经济理论[J];经济科学;1982年01期
8 吴先明;论凯恩斯主义的复兴[J];经济学动态;1997年10期
9 杨德明;被称为“里根经济学”的供给学派[J];w芸,
本文编号:1644082
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jjsxs/1644082.html