北京市入境旅游产业结构优化研究
发布时间:2018-05-15 20:42
本文选题:入境旅游 + 产业结构 ; 参考:《广州大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:入境旅游是我国旅游产业非常重要的组成部分,也是旅游产业发展水平的重要体现。目前尚无学者对北京市入境旅游产业结构优化进行研究。本文以北京市入境旅游产业2001-2011年相关数据为研究样本,以区域经济学和产业经济学等相关理论为理论指导,以北京市入境旅游产业演化规律为切入点,首先从内部结构、结构效益和结构关联度三个方面对北京市入境旅游产业结构现状和发展演变趋势进行分析研究。 内部结构分析中,采用了比较分析法,以全国入境旅游产业发展和北京市国民经济发展为参照,对北京市入境旅游产业结构发展演化特点进行研究探索,研究得出北京市入境旅游产业呈现衰退现象,产业结构分布不合理,虽然其产业结构演化向着合理化方向发展,但低于全国入境旅游产业优化的发展速度。同时,,运用区位熵、产业结构变化指数和产业集中度对北京市入境旅游产业内部结构进行定性研究,研究得出北京市入境旅游产业整体专业化程度不高,仅长途交通部门、住宿部门和邮电通讯部门具有专业优势;产业结构转变过慢;各部门的创汇能力差距在缩小。说明虽然北京市入境旅游产业结构的分散化、多元化趋势在逐步形成,但是较弱的专业优势和较慢的结构转变速度阻碍了北京市入境旅游产业的发展。结构效益分析中,克服传统偏离-份额分析法无法有效揭示考察期内各时间分段对总体变化的贡献及时间维度的发展变化趋势,采用动态偏离-份额分析法对北京市入境旅游产业结构效益进行研究分析,研究得出北京市入境旅游产业整体上不具有结构优势,结构效益对入境旅游收入的贡献很小。长途交通部门结构效益较好但缺乏竞争力,结构分量2006年之后整体提升;景区游览部门和文化娱乐部近年来结构效益提高;2007-2011年,商品部门竞争力水平超过全国,但是结构效益较差;餐饮部门具有竞争优势,但是结构效益较低。邮电通讯部门发展不稳定,时好时坏。产业关联度分析中,运用灰色关联度分析法对各部门的关联度进行研究分析,研究结果表明北京市入境旅游产业各部门关联度不高,且差异较大。收入关联度最大的部门是基础设施部门,如长途交通、游览观光和市内交通,商品部门和文化娱乐部门的关联度过低。 通过上述分析,遵循产业结构优化的基本原则,设定了入境旅游产业结构优化的目标体系,提出了优化北京市入境旅游产业结构优化的具体措施:优化旅游产业供给,提高旅游产品国际吸引力;改善产业内部结构,增强部门竞争优势;强化产业关联;积极承办国际会议,开发二次游客。
[Abstract]:Inbound tourism is a very important part of China's tourism industry, and also an important embodiment of the development level of tourism industry. At present, there are no scholars on the optimization of inbound tourism industry structure in Beijing. This paper takes the relevant data of Beijing inbound tourism industry from 2001 to 2011 as the research sample, takes the relevant theories such as regional economics and industrial economics as the theoretical guidance, and takes the evolution law of Beijing's inbound tourism industry as the starting point, first of all, from the internal structure. This paper analyzes the present situation and development trend of inbound tourism industry structure in Beijing from three aspects of structural benefit and structural correlation degree. In the internal structure analysis, the comparative analysis method is used to study and explore the characteristics of the development and evolution of the inbound tourism industry structure in Beijing, taking the development of the national inbound tourism industry and the development of the Beijing national economy as the reference. The research shows that the inbound tourism industry in Beijing is in decline and the industrial structure distribution is unreasonable. Although its industrial structure evolves in the direction of rationalization, it is lower than the speed of the optimization of the national inbound tourism industry. At the same time, by using location entropy, industrial structure change index and industrial concentration degree, this paper studies the internal structure of Beijing's inbound tourism industry qualitatively, and concludes that the overall specialization degree of Beijing's inbound tourism industry is not high, only long-distance transportation departments. The accommodation department and the post and telecommunications department have the specialized advantage; the industrial structure changes too slowly; each department's foreign exchange earning ability disparity is narrowing. It shows that although the structure of inbound tourism industry in Beijing is becoming more and more diversified, the weak professional advantage and the slower speed of structural transformation hinder the development of Beijing's inbound tourism industry. In the structural benefit analysis, overcoming the traditional deviation-share analysis method can not effectively reveal the contribution of each time segment to the overall change and the development trend of the time dimension. This paper studies and analyzes the structural benefits of inbound tourism industry in Beijing by means of dynamic deviation-share analysis. The results show that the inbound tourism industry in Beijing has no structural advantages as a whole and the contribution of structural benefits to inbound tourism income is very small. The structural benefits of the long-distance transportation sector are better but lack of competitiveness, and the structural component has been promoted overall since 2006. In recent years, the tourism sector and the Ministry of Culture and Recreation have improved their structural efficiency. From 2007 to 2011, the level of competitiveness of the commodity sector is higher than that of the whole country. But the structure benefit is poor; the catering department has the competitive advantage, but the structure benefit is low. The development of the post and telecommunications department is unstable, with good times and bad times. In the analysis of industrial correlation degree, the grey correlation degree analysis method is used to study the correlation degree of each department. The result shows that the correlation degree of each department of Beijing's inbound tourism industry is not high, and the difference is great. The sectors with the highest income correlation are infrastructure sectors such as long-distance transportation, sightseeing and urban transportation, while the commodity sector and the cultural and entertainment sector are too low. Based on the above analysis, following the basic principles of industrial structure optimization, the paper sets the target system for optimizing the industrial structure of inbound tourism, and puts forward specific measures to optimize the industrial structure of inbound tourism in Beijing: optimizing the supply of tourism industry, To improve the international attraction of tourism products; to improve the internal structure of the industry and strengthen the competitive advantage of the departments; to strengthen the industrial linkages; to actively host international conferences and develop secondary tourists.
【学位授予单位】:广州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:F592.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王薇;陆林;;山西省国际旅游产业结构分析[J];安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版);2008年03期
2 彭惠林;;北京入境旅游发展趋势及建议[J];才智;2011年01期
3 庄小丽;康传德;;湖北省旅游产业结构分析与优化[J];中国地质大学学报(社会科学版);2006年06期
4 葛军;刘家明;;广东省国际旅游产业结构与竞争力的偏离份额分析[J];地理科学进展;2011年06期
5 兰楠;;旅游产业结构合理化在实际中的约束分析[J];四川省干部函授学院学报;2011年03期
6 张春晖;张红;白凯;刘丽;;基于动态偏离-份额和灰色关联分析的陕西入境旅游产业结构与竞争力分析[J];旅游论坛;2010年01期
7 张精惠;甘巧林;;广州国际旅游产业结构的综合定量分析[J];贵州大学学报(自然科学版);2011年06期
8 李辉;罗寿枚;;广东国际旅游产业结构探析[J];华南师范大学学报(自然科学版);2006年02期
9 陈雪琼,任晓春;福建省旅游产业结构研究及其优化对策[J];华侨大学学报(人文社会科学版);2001年03期
10 王颜齐;郭翔宇;曹玉昆;;黑龙江省农业结构与竞争力的动态偏离份额分析[J];哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版);2008年05期
本文编号:1893871
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/lyjj/1893871.html