新世纪以来中印参与国际经济制度战略比较

发布时间：2018-05-07 10:26

本文选题：比较 + 中印　；参考：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：中印两国作为世界舞台上的两大新兴经济体,在国际社会中的地位和话语权不断提升,两国积极参与国际事务和全球治理,在国际舞台上发挥了越来越重要的作用。近年来,随着中印两国的国际地位日益提高,两国在国际事务中的参与度也不断增强,特别是在国际经济制度中的参与程度也日益加深。本文依据战略理基本要素,即战略目标、战略模式和战略结果的相关概念界定全文研究框架,运用并且采取案例分析法,选取世界贸易组织、二十国集团和金砖机制作为研究案例,比较中印两国在上述三个案例中参与战略的异同点,从而得出中印参与国际经济制度战略的一般性结论。在世界贸易组织中,中印两国都有加强国际贸易联系的共同战略目标,不同的是中国旨在融入多边贸易体制,而印度则更多的希望利用世贸规则。在参与模式上,中印两国都采取均势和联盟战略模式,但是印度在联盟战略模式的使用上更加灵活主动。通过两国各自的参与,中印双方贸易有了快速发展,同时有效影响了多哈谈判进程。不仅如此,中国成功融入了多边贸易体制,而印度成为了世贸组织中发展中国家的领头羊。在二十国集团机制中,中印双方制定了推动国际金融体系改革的战略目标,不同的是,中国希望进一步提升自己在全球经济治理中的地位,而印度则更加关注经济稳定和发展问题。在参与模式上,中印采取了均势和联盟战略模式,但是中国在联盟中发挥了更大的作用。通过两国参与,中印在二十国集团中成功推动了国际货币基金组织改革,但是总体而言,中国的影响力要高于印度。在金砖国家机制中,中印都有提升新兴国家地位的战略目标,但是不同的是,中国更希望加强新兴经济体联系,而印度则希望获得更大的政治收益。中印两国采取了不同的战略模式,印度采取了均势战略模式,而中国采取了统一战线模式,最终中印推动金砖成立了金砖国家开发银行,印度通过金砖国际地位提升比中国更加显著。通过对中印两国战略目标的分析,可以得出结论:中印双方都将自己定义为新兴大国,同时仍是发展中国家,但是不同的是,对中国意图的判断上,印度认为中国会对其产生威胁。在参与国际经济制度过程中,中印双方较为偏好均势战略模式和联盟战略模式,总体而言,印度的联盟战略模式运用比中国更为灵活有效。未来,中印双方在参与国际经济制度过程中,仍有较为广阔的合作空间,中印两国应该中印两国进一步深化在国际经济制度中的合作,可以经济发展为战略重心,在合作中不断增进战略互信,联合广大发展中国家,最终为维护中印两国国家利益和目标服务。
[Abstract]:As two big emerging economies on the world stage, China and India have been playing an increasingly important role in international affairs and global governance. In recent years, with the increasing international status of China and India, the participation of the two countries in international affairs is also increasing, especially in the international economic system. According to the basic elements of strategic theory, that is, strategic objectives, strategic models and strategic results, this paper defines the research framework of the full text, applies and adopts the case analysis method, selects the World Trade Organization (WTO). The Group of Twenty and the BRICS mechanism are used as research cases to compare the similarities and differences of the participation strategies of China and India in the above three cases, so as to draw a general conclusion of the strategy of China and India's participation in the international economic system. In the World Trade Organization, both China and India share a common strategic goal of strengthening international trade ties. The difference is that China aims to integrate into the multilateral trading system, while India hopes to make more use of WTO rules. In the participation mode, both China and India adopt the balance of power and alliance strategy model, but India is more flexible and active in the use of alliance strategy model. Through their respective participation, trade between China and India has developed rapidly and has effectively affected the Doha negotiation process. Not only that, China has been successfully integrated into the multilateral trading system, and India has become the leader of developing countries in the WTO. In the G20 mechanism, China and India have set out strategic goals to promote the reform of the international financial system. The difference is that China hopes to further enhance its position in global economic governance. India, on the other hand, is more concerned about economic stability and development. In the participation mode, China and India adopted the balance of power and alliance strategy mode, but China played a greater role in the alliance. With the participation of both countries, China and India successfully pushed for IMF reform in the G20, but overall, China has more influence than India. In the BRICS mechanism, both China and India have a strategic goal of promoting emerging countries, but unlike China, which wants stronger links with emerging economies, India wants greater political gains. China and India have adopted different strategic models, India has adopted a balance of power model, and China has adopted a United front model, and eventually China and India have promoted the establishment of the BRICS Development Bank. India's rise in international status through BRICS is more pronounced than China's. Through the analysis of the strategic objectives of China and India, we can draw a conclusion that both China and India define themselves as emerging powers and are still developing countries, but the difference is that they judge China's intentions. India sees China as a threat. In the process of participating in the international economic system, China and India prefer the balance of power strategy model and the alliance strategy model. In general, India's alliance strategy model is more flexible and effective than China's. In the future, China and India will still have a relatively broad scope for cooperation in the process of participating in the international economic system. China and India should further deepen their cooperation in the international economic system so that economic development can be the strategic focus. In cooperation, we will continue to enhance strategic mutual trust, unite with the vast number of developing countries, and ultimately serve the interests and objectives of both countries.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F125;F135.1

【参考文献】