返本溯源:作为学科对象的客家研究

发布时间：2018-01-24 11:00

本文关键词： 客家学近年罗香林回到原典《崇正同人系谱》　出处：《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：近30年来的客家研究基本上是对罗香林等的研究的"照着说"或"接着说"。由于种种原因,一个自20世纪30年代即被提出的客家学学科命题,目前仍处于被主流学术圈甄别、认可与接纳的状态。提倡"回到原典"并不是"为方法而方法",它关涉客家研究的学术史梳理,同时也是为了更历史地把握客家研究的具体内涵,规范日益失去言说边界的研究现状,并有效地寻找与提取作为学科对象的客家学学科元素。以此重返历史语境的《崇正同人系谱》,方能正确理解这一曾被熟视无睹的客家史籍对以往客家问题的学术性提升意义。从赖际熙到罗香林,不过十年的时间,但若没有前者所作的学术蓄势,1930年代初的客家研究或许会是另一种情形。
[Abstract]:The Hakka research in the past 30 years is basically "according to" or "goes on" to the research of Luo Xianglin and so on. For various reasons, a subject proposition of Hakka has been put forward since 1930s. At present, it is still in the state of being identified, recognized and accepted by the mainstream academic circle. To advocate "returning to the original Canon" is not "method and method", it is concerned with the academic history of Hakka research. At the same time, it is also in order to grasp the specific connotation of Hakka research more and more historically, and to standardize the research status quo of losing the boundary of speech day by day. And effectively search for and extract as the subject of Hakka discipline elements, so as to return to the historical context of the "Chongzheng Tongren pedigree". Only then can we correctly understand the academic significance of this once ignored Hakka historical book to the past Hakka problems. From Lai Jixi to Luo Xianglin, it took only 10 years, but without the academic reserve made by the former. Hakka research in the early 1930 s might have been a different story.
【作者单位】：嘉应学院文学院;
【分类号】：C95
【正文快照】： 一、回望:近30年来的客家研究对于20世纪80年代以前的客家研究,目前学界大都以20世纪30年代罗香林的研究为界分为两个时期。《客家研究导论》(1)第一章“客家问题的发端”简单回顾了19世纪五六十年代自“洪杨起义”及“西路斗案”以来至20世纪30年代之客家研究情形,并把它划

【相似文献】