马克思道德理论范式决疑

发布时间：2018-01-01 21:38

本文关键词：马克思道德理论范式决疑　出处：《学术月刊》2013年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：马克思道德理论范式与现代西方道德理论范式根本不同,乃至对立,故以现代西方道德理论范式去探寻马克思道德理论是有失科学性与合理性的。现代西方建立在价值与事实二分之上的道德理论范式的失足之处在于遗忘了"实践"这一融合事实与价值的关键,从而将道德来源陷入迷思之中,由此导致了道德领域的"诸神混战",消解了道德合理性。而马克思基于历史唯物主义的立场,通过确立实践的基础或优先地位,将"事实"看做是"人的实践",从而将道德理论范式建立在消融了事实与价值二分鸿沟的实践之上,既科学地避免了"科学主义"与"主观主义"的偏颇,又明确地将道德来源奠定在"社会存在"之上,从而弥补和克服了西方道德理论范式的局限。从当代西方理论前沿动态看,一些敏锐的哲学家已经认识到建立在价值与事实二分基础之上的知识论与方法论的局限性,并逐渐展开了试图通过实践的引入来弥合事实与价值二分鸿沟的研究。由是观之,马克思道德理论范式比现代西方道德理论范式更具某种科学性、合理性与社会批判性。
[Abstract]:Marx's moral theory paradigm and modern western moral theory paradigm are fundamentally different and even opposite. Therefore, it is unscientific and reasonable to explore Marx's moral theory with the modern western moral theory paradigm. The misstep of the moral theoretical paradigm based on the dichotomy of value and fact in the modern West lies in forgetting. " Practice "is the key to the fusion of facts and values." Thus, the source of morality is trapped in the myth, which leads to the "various gods melee" in the field of morality, and dispels the moral rationality, while Marx based on the standpoint of historical materialism. By establishing the basis or priority of practice, "fact" is regarded as "human practice", and the moral theory paradigm is based on the practice which melts the dichotomy between fact and value. It not only avoids the bias of scientism and subjectivism scientifically, but also clearly establishes the moral source on the basis of "social existence". In order to make up for and overcome the limitations of the western moral theory paradigm. Some keen philosophers have recognized the limitations of knowledge theory and methodology based on the dichotomy of value and fact. And gradually carried out through the introduction of practice to bridge the dichotomy between fact and value. From the perspective of Marx's moral theory paradigm than the modern western moral theory paradigm is more scientific. Rationality and social criticism.
【作者单位】：浙江师范大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：浙江省哲学社会科学规划“之江青年”课题“核和平利用的伦理审视——核伦理学研究的新视域”(11ZJQN079YB) 教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务项目二类课题“高校青年马克思主义队伍培养和建设研究”(11JD710077)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B82-0
【正文快照】： “马克思到底有没有道德理论”的学术论争在马克思身后持续不断,尤以由“塔克尔—伍德命题”①所引发的持续至今的争论为烈。然而,参与争论者皆在使用一个相同的理论工具,即用现代西方道德理论范式为尺规去衡量、宰制马克思道德理论。但是,马克思道德理论范式与现代西方道德

【共引文献】