道德推理的复杂性及其类型差异

发布时间：2018-01-07 05:50

本文关键词：道德推理的复杂性及其类型差异　出处：《河北学刊》2013年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：作为一种基本的理性能力,推理是人对必然或可能的事物由一个或几个已知的判断作出新判断(结论)的过程。对必然事物的判断构成事实推理,对所意愿事物的判断构成价值推理即实践推理;事实推理以万物循以产生的规律为基础,实践推理以万物应循以产生的规律为前提。而在实践推理的域限内,有以追求快乐和幸福为目的的实践推理,可称之为价值性的实践推理;有以考量观念和行为正当性为旨归的实践推理,可称之为有关正当性的实践推理,即道德推理。道德推理是德性论的重要组成部分,既是善恶观念的充分运用,又是实践智慧的充分显现。道德推理可能表现于行为的动机、过程和结果中,但其自身则是观念性的活动。道德推理可能伴随着情感体验,但其自身却是理性化的过程。在不同的社会生活语境下,道德推理的适用范围和运行方式是不同的。
[Abstract]:As a kind of rational ability, reasoning is one of the things necessary or possible by one or several known new judgement judgment (conclusion) process. The inevitable judgment constitutes fact reasoning, reasoning that value practical reasoning of desired judgment; fact to all things to produce evidence reasoning based on the law, practical reasoning to all things should follow to produce the law as the premise. In practical reasoning domain limits, to the pursuit of happiness and happiness for the purpose of practical reasoning, can be referred to as the value of practical reasoning; have the legitimacy to the idea and behavior for the consideration of practical reasoning aims, can called the practice of reasoning about the legitimacy of the moral reasoning. Moral reasoning is an important part of the theory of virtue, make full use of both the concepts of good and evil, and fully show the wisdom of practice. Moral reasoning is possible in motivation, In process and result, but it is a conceptual activity itself. Moral reasoning may be accompanied by emotional experience, but it is a process of rationalization itself. In different social life contexts, the scope and operation mode of moral reasoning are different.

【作者单位】：北京师范大学哲学与社会学学院;
【分类号】：B82-0
【正文快照】： 在伦理学研究中,对道德推理的研究是比较薄弱的,惟其如此,关于德性论的研究也就不够深入而全面。一如关于德性的研究需要结构主义和生成论的思维方式,对道德推理的研究亦须如此。道德推理构成了德性之原始发生的核心环节。一、实践推理与道德推理任何推理都是面向未来可能的事

【共引文献】