儒家“德行伦理”与中国伦理形态的现代建构

发布时间：2018-01-08 01:10

本文关键词：儒家“德行伦理”与中国伦理形态的现代建构　出处：《哲学研究》2017年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：从儒家经典的分析中可以发现,儒家伦理形态是一种不同于西方美德伦理(Virtue Ethics)和规则伦理(Normative Ethics)的"德行伦理"。它涵蕴着内外两个向度:就内在向度而言,是"在心为德",强调行为者的道德心理是"德"之实现的内在根据,并赋予人之为人的目的性价值,这在后儒对孟子的承续与发展中呈现出丰富的图景;就外在向度而言,是"施之为行",即同时强调行为规则在"德"之实现中的价值。基于此内外统一的理论进路,儒家德行伦理虽然兼及了"Virtue Ethics"或"Normative Ethics"的意涵,却不宜直接将其纳入二者的分析框架,而应作为一种独立的伦理形态而存在。也正是在这个意义上,"儒家德行伦理"作为一种"会通型"伦理形态的地方性资源,应积极参与创建新时代条件下的全球伦理,而这也正是当代中国伦理形态现代建构的方向所指。"现代性转化"与"开放性吸收"始终是这个过程不可省略的方法和立场。
[Abstract]:It can be found from the analysis of Confucian classics. Confucian ethics is different from Virtue Ethicsand Normative Ethicsof Western Virtue Ethics. It implies two dimensions of internal and external: in terms of internal dimension. It emphasizes that the moral psychology of the actor is the internal basis of the realization of "virtue" and endows the person with the value of purpose, which shows a rich prospect in the continuation and development of Mencius. As far as the external dimension is concerned, it is "doing what one does", that is, emphasizing the value of the behavior rules in the realization of "virtue" at the same time, which is based on the internal and external unity of the theoretical approach. Although the Confucian ethics of virtue and morality contain the meaning of "Virtue Ethics" or "Normative Ethics", they should not be directly included in the analytical framework of the two. It is in this sense that "Confucian ethics", as a local resource of the ethical form of "communication", should exist as an independent form of ethics. We should take an active part in the creation of global ethics in the new era. This is also the direction of modern construction of contemporary Chinese ethical form. "modernity transformation" and "open absorption" are always the methods and stand that can not be omitted in this process.
【作者单位】：南京大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“中国传统士德研究”(编号14AZX017)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B82-092
【正文快照】： 构建具有中国特色的学术话语体系,推动中国与世界的学术交流,是当下的一个重大学术命题,而成熟的现代中国伦理形态之诉求则是当然的题中之义。在关于这个问题的思考中,虽然存在着从亚里士多德那里寻找灵感的观点,但一种理论共识已基本形成:即承认不同历史文化传统的“地方性”

【相似文献】