儒家孝悌责任伦理论辩
发布时间:2018-03-27 15:14
本文选题:儒家家庭 切入点:责任 出处:《周易研究》2017年04期
【摘要】:作为家庭责任伦理的有机组成部分,由儒家所阐发、所倡导的孝悌道德,不仅是一种德性伦理、规范伦理,也是一种责任伦理。历代儒家主要从以下五方面深刻阐述了家庭责任伦理:一是父慈子孝的双向的责任,儒家提出来的父与子的角色责任伦理要求核心是父慈子孝的义务规范;二是游必有方的感情责任,"游必有方"并未否定晚辈行动选择的自由权利,它不过表达了孔子着重强调父母健在时子女必须尽孝道的义务和责任;三是不亏其体的重生责任,我们每个人作为自然存在均有保存生命的义务,"不亏其体,不辱其身"表明我们每个人作为自然存在均有保存生命的义务;四是劳而无怨的代际责任,"劳而不怨"既表达了对父母的关爱、敬重和诚意,又是化解矛盾、避免陷父于不义的合适情感表达;五是兄友弟恭的同辈责任,"友于兄弟"作为体现兄弟双方的对等责任内在地包括"兄友"的责任要求和"弟恭"的义务诫命。
[Abstract]:As an organic part of family responsibility ethics, the filial morality advocated by Confucianism is not only a moral ethics, but also a standard ethics. It is also a kind of responsibility ethics. The Confucianists of the past dynasties mainly elaborated the family responsibility ethics from the following five aspects: one is the two-way responsibility of filial piety between father and son, the core of the role responsibility ethics of father and son put forward by Confucianism is the duty norm of father's kindness and filial piety; The second is the emotional responsibility of the "must be good", which does not deny the free right of the younger generation to choose their actions, but it only expresses Confucius's emphasis on the duty and responsibility of filial piety when his parents are alive; and thirdly, he does not lose his body's responsibility for rebirth. Each of us, as a natural being, has the duty to preserve life, and "not to lose its body, not to humiliate its body" means that each of us, as a natural being, has the obligation to preserve life; The fourth is the intergenerational responsibility of labor without resentment, which not only expresses the care, respect and sincerity of parents, but also resolves the contradiction and avoids the appropriate emotional expression of unrighteousness. Fifth, the peer responsibility of fraternity and fraternity, "friendliness" as the embodiment of the equal responsibility of both brothers and friends includes the responsibility requirements of "brother and friend" and the obligation commandment of "brother and friend".
【作者单位】: 山东社会科学院文化研究所;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金项目:“中西伦理学比较视域中的儒家责任伦理思想研究”(14BZX046)
【分类号】:B222;B823.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 潘自勉;理性与生活意义——关于责任伦理的思考[J];广东社会科学;1991年03期
2 陈思坤;;出于责任的行为具有道德价值——康德责任伦理观的逻辑基点[J];山西师大学报(社会科学版);2012年05期
3 王善英;;人学视域中的韦伯思想解读[J];山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2007年03期
4 刘登科;康德的责任概念及其责任伦理观[J];中共南京市委党校南京市行政学院学报;2004年05期
5 张春香;《周易》责任伦理思想浅析[J];周易研究;2005年02期
6 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 王倩倩;;试析康德“责任伦理”对《新教伦理与资本主义精神》的影响[A];云南师范大学思想政治理论课教育教学研究与理论探索[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 白如祥邋张桂珍;儒家责任伦理的当代价值[N];学习时报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 刘敏;孟子的政治责任伦理思想研究[D];上海师范大学;2013年
,本文编号:1672061
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/falvlunlilunwen/1672061.html