论底线伦理的“后退”与信念伦理的“缺乏”

发布时间：2018-03-29 08:11

本文选题：底线伦理　切入点：“后退”　出处：《伦理学研究》2017年06期

【摘要】：中国社会当下的道德现实警示我们,底线伦理正在呈现"后退"之势。同时,由于社会超速世俗化和市场化所致,却又"缺乏"信念伦理。若无坚实而清晰的信念伦理的支撑,底线伦理的"后退"就难以避免,最终也将无法维系和坚持。信念伦理是一种特殊的道德类型学,狭义的信念伦理是指在一般伦理领域内,与(传统的)美德伦理、规范伦理、现代分析伦理(或"元伦理学")相较而立的伦理(学)类型。它以信仰或信念为终极道德目的和最高行为规范,以道德或伦理的理想价值(或韦伯意义上的"目的性价值")为终极道德伦理的价值评价标准,借助于道德文化传统的理想范型、道德先贤、道德典范或道德先进的范例化(examplification)或道德类型学(moral typology)研究,阐发、论证和确立一整套基本道德伦理规范和伦理学基本理论。
[Abstract]:The current moral reality in Chinese society warns us that the bottom line ethics is showing a trend of "retreat". At the same time, due to the excessive secularization and marketization of the society, it "lacks" the belief ethics. The "retreat" of bottom-line ethics is inevitable, and ultimately it will be impossible to maintain and adhere to it. Belief ethics is a special kind of moral typology. In a narrow sense, belief ethics refers to the ethics of virtue and norms in the field of general ethics. Modern analytical ethics (or "meta-ethics") compared to the ethical (academic) type. It regards belief or belief as the ultimate moral goal and the highest standard of conduct. Taking the ideal value of morality or ethics (or "purposive value" in Weber's sense) as the value evaluation standard of ultimate moral ethics, with the help of the ideal model of moral cultural tradition, the moral forerunner, The study of moral model or advanced moral paradigm or moral typology (moral typology) studies, expounds, demonstrates and establishes a set of basic ethical norms and ethical basic theories.
【作者单位】：南京大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“构建中华民族伟大复兴中国梦的伦理秩序”(14BZX088) 江苏省社会科学基金项目“构建中华民族伟大复兴中国梦的伦理秩序研究”(14SZB001)
【分类号】：B82-0

【相似文献】