告子人性论辨析

发布时间：2018-05-16 20:52

本文选题：告子 + 性无善无不善　；参考：《伦理学研究》2014年03期

【摘要】：朱熹、牟宗三和唐君毅都倾向于把告子的性无善无不善论等同于性可善可不善论。针对这种倾向,本文首先分析这几位哲学家对于告子人性论的理解及其存在的困难,初步澄清告子的性无善无不善论与性可善可不善论在人性设定上的差异,即性可善可不善论所隐含的人性论可以是性无善无不善论,也可以是性善论、性恶论乃至善恶潜在混合论。然后通过考察和辨析告子的仁内义外学说,揭示它与性无善无不善论之间的内在关联,借此呈现性无善无不善论与性可善可不善论在善恶产生途径上的差别,即性可善可不善论认为一个人的善恶是由环境造成的,而性无善无不善论则认为一个人的善与恶取决于自己如何对待自己的本性,所以告子有不动心养气之说。
[Abstract]:Zhu Xi, Mou Zongsan and Tang Junyi all tend to equate the theory of sexual good with that of sex. In view of this tendency, this paper first analyzes the understanding and the difficulties of these philosophers on the theory of human nature, and preliminarily clarifies the difference between the theory of whether the nature is good or not and the theory of whether the nature can be good or not. That is to say, the theory of human nature implied by the theory of good or bad of nature can be the theory of no good or bad of nature, or the theory of good of nature, the theory of evil and even the theory of potential mixture of good and evil. Then, by examining and discriminating the theory of benevolence, righteousness and exterior, this paper reveals the inner relation between it and the theory of no good and no bad of nature, and thus presents the difference between the theory of no good of nature and the theory of good and bad of nature. That is, the theory of good or bad of sex thinks that a person's good or evil is caused by the environment, while the theory of no good of nature and evil of nature think that one's good and evil depend on how one treats his own nature.
【作者单位】：山东大学犹太教与跨宗教研究中心暨哲学与社会发展学院;
【基金】：山东大学自主创新基金青年团队项目“经典诠释与哲学创新”(IFYT1213)
【分类号】：B82-09

【参考文献】