道德义务的神圣命令理论探析
发布时间:2018-06-04 13:41
本文选题:道德 + 义务 ; 参考:《道德与文明》2016年03期
【摘要】:作为一种元伦理学理论,神圣命令理论主张道德完全而直接地依赖于上帝的命令。"游叙弗伦两难"迫使神令论的辩护者们从意图解释价值论地位和道义论地位的无限定的神令论转向了仅意图解释道义论地位的有限定的神令论。亚当斯论证道德义务是由一位善的和仁爱的上帝的命令所构成,这是有限定的神令论的一个代表性版本。奎恩就道义论地位的神学唯意志论给出了一种累积案例论证。虽然神令论可能具有某些潜在的理论优势,但其遭到的各种反驳说明它还远没有实现完全而直接地解释道德义务这一初始目标。
[Abstract]:As a meta-ethical theory, the theory of divine command advocates that morality is completely and directly dependent on God's command. " Yu Suffron's dilemma "forced the deity defenders to shift from the infinitely determined theology of intention to explain the position of axiology and deontic position to the qualified doctrine of divinity which only intended to explain the position of deontics." Adams argued that moral obligation consists of the command of a good and benevolent God, a representative version of a qualified doctrine of divinity. Quinn gave a cumulative case study on theology of deontic status. Although theocracy may have some potential theoretical advantages, its various rebuttal shows that it is far from achieving the initial goal of fully and directly explaining moral obligation.
【作者单位】: 厦门大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】:福建省社科规划青年项目(FJ2015C009)
【分类号】:B82-0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈真;;道德义务与超道德的行为[J];伦理学研究;2008年05期
2 周艺;;浅析道德义务法律化的可行性[J];法制与社会;2009年16期
3 刘金凌;;道德义务理论溯源[J];辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版);2010年04期
4 王s,
本文编号:1977566
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/falvlunlilunwen/1977566.html