关于自律内涵的道德哲学辨析

发布时间：2018-06-20 02:18

本文选题：自律 + 道德自律　；参考：《道德与文明》2014年03期

【摘要】：文化差异性增加了我们理解自律概念的难度。在康德将自律视为唯一和最高的道德原则之后,理性自律的理念对西方道德研究的各个领域都产生了深刻影响。然而,今天自律的内涵已远远超出了康德的设定,它既可以在道德意义上使用,也可以在非道德意义上使用;既被视为道德的本质属性,又被作为道德发展的重要指针。对个体的道德自律还可做程度和内容的分析,进而区分自律道德和他律道德这两种道德水平或道德类型,以及判断自律、意志自律和行为自律等不同方面。
[Abstract]:Cultural differences increase the difficulty of understanding the concept of self-discipline. After Kant regards self-discipline as the only and highest moral principle, the concept of rational self-discipline has a profound influence on the various fields of western moral research. However, the connotation of self-discipline today is far beyond the set of Conde. It can be used in moral sense. It can also be used in the non moral sense, not only as the essential attribute of morality, but also as an important indicator of moral development. It can also analyze the degree and content of the individual's moral self-discipline, and then distinguish between the two moral levels or the moral types of self-discipline and heteronomy, as well as self-discipline, self-discipline and self-discipline. In the same way.
【作者单位】：南京信息工程大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：全国教育科学“十二五”规划教育部青年专项(EEA130384)
【分类号】：B82-02

【相似文献】