中西责任观跨文化研究
发布时间:2021-06-05 23:03
责任作为伦理学的一个重要范畴,在主要的人际关系中特别是在家庭和集体中起着重要作用。责任观作为一个重要的价值观念,进一步地反映了人与他人的关系。在承认所有文化里的责任观的普遍性的同时,人们还必须认识到责任的不同文化涵义。由于文化价值尺度的影响,中西方人有不同的家庭观念和集体观念,基于这两种观念的差异,中西文化之间的家庭责任观念和集体责任观念也会有所不同。因此,探讨责任问题,必须发掘它的文化特征和文化根源。本文采用比较和对比的方法,对中西方的责任观进行跨文化研究。本文对责任观的跨文化研究集中在家庭责任与集体责任。运用霍夫斯塔德的文化价值理论和面子理论阐述这两种责任观在中西文化里的不同之处。对差异的分析得出,中国人的家庭责任观体现了家庭成员之间分等级的职责,而西方人的家庭责任观体现了每个家庭成员的平等作用。中国人的集体责任观着重在维持成员之间的和谐关系和实现集体目标之间保持一个平衡,而西方人的集体责任观则以突出个人责任来实现集体目标。此外,通过对跨文化家庭和国际商务磋商中的由责任观引起跨文化冲突的讨论,本文得出最终结论:中西责任观的差异体现了面子取向的问题。中国人承担责任的方式是以他人取向的...
【文章来源】:宁波大学浙江省
【文章页数】:46 页
【学位级别】:硕士
【文章目录】:
摘要
Abstract
1 Introduction
1.1 Study Objectives and Significance
1.2 Study Methods and Structure
2 Literature Review
2.1 Definitions of Responsibility
2.2 Studies of Responsibility at Home and Abroad
2.3 Intercultural Study on Responsibility
3 Theoretical Framework
3.1 Hofstede’s Theory of Cultural Value
3.1.1 Collectivism-Individualism
3.1.2 Power Distance
3.2 Face Theory
4 An Intercultural Perspective on Responsibility
4.1 Different Cultural Origins of Responsibility
4.1.1 The Origin of Responsibility in Traditional Chinese Culture
4.1.2 The Origin of Responsibility in the Western Culture
4.2 Different Notions of Family Responsibility
4.2.1 The Chinese Notions of Family Responsibility
4.2.2 The Western Notions of Family Responsibility
4.3 Different Notions of Collective Responsibility
4.3.1 The Chinese Notions of Collective Responsibility
4.3.2 The Western Notions of Collective Responsibility
5 Intercultural Conflict and the Notions of Responsibility
5.1 Intercultural Conflict
5.2 Conflicts Caused by Different Notions of Responsibility
5.2.1 Different Notions of Family Responsibility in Intercultural Families
5.2.2 Different Notions of Collective Responsibility in International Business Negotiations
5.3 An Intercultural Perspective on Conflict Management
6 Conclusion
Bibliography
Academic Achievements and Awards
Acknowledgments
【参考文献】:
期刊论文
[1]责任观的中西文化比较研究[J]. 陈碧云,李小平. 心理学探新. 2008(01)
[2]中西道德责任观比较研究[J]. 侯忠海,戴茂堂. 江汉论坛. 2007(09)
[3]西方学界关于责任起源的三种构想及其比较[J]. 况志华,叶浩生. 教育研究与实验. 2007(04)
[4]责任心研究的现状与展望[J]. 徐玉玲,叶浩生. 常州工学院学报(社科版). 2007(03)
[5]责任和责任心的涵义与结构[J]. 赵兴奎,张大均. 山西财经大学学报(高等教育版). 2007(01)
[6]为他责任:走出自我责任与集体责任的困境[J]. 顾红亮. 南京社会科学. 2006(10)
[7]责任感问题的理论研究[J]. 刘飞,刘义. 安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版). 2006(03)
[8]责任的伦理意蕴[J]. 孙君恒,许玲. 哲学动态. 2004(09)
[9]中美家庭教育的跨文化比较[J]. 黄河清. 外国中小学教育. 2003(11)
[10]我的跨国婚姻[J]. 吴京燕. Women of China. 2002(12)
本文编号:3213089
【文章来源】:宁波大学浙江省
【文章页数】:46 页
【学位级别】:硕士
【文章目录】:
摘要
Abstract
1 Introduction
1.1 Study Objectives and Significance
1.2 Study Methods and Structure
2 Literature Review
2.1 Definitions of Responsibility
2.2 Studies of Responsibility at Home and Abroad
2.3 Intercultural Study on Responsibility
3 Theoretical Framework
3.1 Hofstede’s Theory of Cultural Value
3.1.1 Collectivism-Individualism
3.1.2 Power Distance
3.2 Face Theory
4 An Intercultural Perspective on Responsibility
4.1 Different Cultural Origins of Responsibility
4.1.1 The Origin of Responsibility in Traditional Chinese Culture
4.1.2 The Origin of Responsibility in the Western Culture
4.2 Different Notions of Family Responsibility
4.2.1 The Chinese Notions of Family Responsibility
4.2.2 The Western Notions of Family Responsibility
4.3 Different Notions of Collective Responsibility
4.3.1 The Chinese Notions of Collective Responsibility
4.3.2 The Western Notions of Collective Responsibility
5 Intercultural Conflict and the Notions of Responsibility
5.1 Intercultural Conflict
5.2 Conflicts Caused by Different Notions of Responsibility
5.2.1 Different Notions of Family Responsibility in Intercultural Families
5.2.2 Different Notions of Collective Responsibility in International Business Negotiations
5.3 An Intercultural Perspective on Conflict Management
6 Conclusion
Bibliography
Academic Achievements and Awards
Acknowledgments
【参考文献】:
期刊论文
[1]责任观的中西文化比较研究[J]. 陈碧云,李小平. 心理学探新. 2008(01)
[2]中西道德责任观比较研究[J]. 侯忠海,戴茂堂. 江汉论坛. 2007(09)
[3]西方学界关于责任起源的三种构想及其比较[J]. 况志华,叶浩生. 教育研究与实验. 2007(04)
[4]责任心研究的现状与展望[J]. 徐玉玲,叶浩生. 常州工学院学报(社科版). 2007(03)
[5]责任和责任心的涵义与结构[J]. 赵兴奎,张大均. 山西财经大学学报(高等教育版). 2007(01)
[6]为他责任:走出自我责任与集体责任的困境[J]. 顾红亮. 南京社会科学. 2006(10)
[7]责任感问题的理论研究[J]. 刘飞,刘义. 安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版). 2006(03)
[8]责任的伦理意蕴[J]. 孙君恒,许玲. 哲学动态. 2004(09)
[9]中美家庭教育的跨文化比较[J]. 黄河清. 外国中小学教育. 2003(11)
[10]我的跨国婚姻[J]. 吴京燕. Women of China. 2002(12)
本文编号:3213089
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/falvlunlilunwen/3213089.html