开放空间会议技术:让协商民主运转起来
发布时间:2018-05-26 12:08
本文选题:协商民主 + 民主技术 ; 参考:《华中师范大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:协商民主是当前理论研究的热点,随着国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的推进,作为中国社会主义民主政治的特有形式和独特优势的协商民主开始从理论研究走向实践深入。推进协商民主广泛多层制度化发展将基层协商民主实践和实现问题推到前沿,民主技术无疑是推进协商在乡土中国有效运转的关键。协商民主的研究已经关注到民主权利、治理理念和治理技术等要素,但是技术空间的政治学知识供给不足却使协商操作化、流程化、具体化难以实现,基层协商“悬空”成为民主实践的现实问题。当前中国协商民主实践面临有热情而无思路、有目标而无路径、有想法而无办法的困境,协商民主有效融入民主政治实践仍然有待深化。本文将民主技术与协商民主相深刻联系,提出以民主技术助力协商民主实践的观点,以理念可靠、规则明确、流程清晰、技术可行的协商技术路径为支撑,实现协商价值的彰显,以可操作化的民主技术拓展协商实践的空间,让协商民主有效运转起来。本文引入"Open Space Technology"(开放空间会议技术)的协商民主技术,全面分析其缘起、规程、原则,并通过北京市菊儿社区的开放空间会议技术协商实践案例,全景式展示会议过程、操作流程、技术指南。本文深入剖析开放空间兴起的理论意义和其与协商价值相契合的实践价值,并将其与浙江温岭市民主恳谈会、广东南塘试验进行对比,分析其在保证公民的参与度、确保参与的平等性、实现需求的可诉性和协商共识可达性上的优势,指出其对传统会议形式实现从“参加”到“参与”、从“会”到“议”的两大转变。本文以实践为基础反思为何协商、与谁协商、怎样协商、持续协商等中国基层协商民主的本土化内涵。民主技术支撑下协商实践丰富协商民主的理论内涵,进一步拓展未来协商实践的空间。技术路径支撑下的协商实践赋予技术—民主的价值定位、独立的主持人制度、部分人对话机制、、公民参与训练等内容;深入探索基层协商民主的实现机制,即基层协商的参与机制、程序机制、反馈机制和保障机制,探索未来基层协商发展的新趋势,推进协商民主有效运转。
[Abstract]:Deliberative democracy is the focus of current theoretical research. With the modernization of national governance system and governance ability, the deliberative democracy, as a unique form and unique advantage of socialist democratic politics in China, began to move from theoretical research to practice. Promoting the extensive and multi-layer institutionalization of consultative democracy pushes the practice and realization of grass-roots consultative democracy to the forefront, and democratic technology is undoubtedly the key to promote the effective operation of consultation in rural China. The research of deliberative democracy has paid close attention to the elements of democratic rights, governance ideas and governance techniques, but the insufficient supply of political science knowledge in the technological space makes it difficult to realize the operation, flow and concretization of negotiation. Grass-roots consultation has become a practical problem in democratic practice. At present, the practice of negotiating democracy in China is faced with the dilemma of enthusiasm but no thought, goal but no path, and idea but no way, so the effective integration of negotiation democracy into democratic political practice still needs to be deepened. In this paper, democratic technology is deeply related to consultative democracy, and the viewpoint of democracy assisted by democratic technology is put forward. It is supported by the negotiation technology path, which is reliable in concept, clear in rules, clear in process and feasible in technology. To realize the value of negotiation and expand the space of negotiation practice with operable democratic technology, so that the democracy of negotiation can operate effectively. This paper introduces "Open Space Technology" (Open Space Conference Technology)'s deliberative democratic technology, analyzes its origin, rules, principles, and shows the process of the meeting in a panoramic way through the practice case of open space conference technology negotiation in Ju'er Community of Beijing. Operation procedure, technical guide. This paper deeply analyzes the theoretical significance of the rise of open space and the practical value of its consonance with the value of negotiation, and compares it with the Democratic Seminar of Wenling City in Zhejiang Province and the Nantang experiment of Guangdong Province, so as to analyze its role in ensuring the participation of citizens. In order to ensure the equality of participation, to realize the advantage of demand litigation and the reachability of negotiation consensus, it is pointed out that the traditional meeting form has changed from "participation" to "participation", from "meeting" to "discussion". On the basis of practice, this paper reflects on the localization of Chinese grass-roots consultative democracy, such as why, with whom, how to negotiate, and how to negotiate continuously. Under the support of democratic technology, negotiation practice enriches the theoretical connotation of consultative democracy and further expands the space of negotiation practice in the future. The negotiation practice supported by the technical path gives the value orientation of technology-democracy, the independent host system, the dialogue mechanism of some people, the training of citizen participation, etc. That is, the participation mechanism, procedural mechanism, feedback mechanism and guarantee mechanism of grass-roots consultation, to explore the new trend of the development of grass-roots consultation in the future, and to promote the effective operation of consultative democracy.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D621.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 黄俊尧;;协商民主与基层实践:对“民主恳谈”模式的再思考[J];湖北社会科学;2007年10期
2 王海稳;;当代中国民主技术的发展困境及原因分析[J];经济社会体制比较;2013年03期
3 李景鹏;建立民主恳谈和民主决策的新机制[J];浙江社会科学;2003年01期
4 王维博;耿昊天;;议事规则:让民主“运转起来”[J];中国新闻周刊;2013年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 媒体人 华提;[N];经济观察报;2012年
2 杭州市政协副秘书长、办公厅主任 孙跃 杭州市政协秘书处干部 王展霞;[N];人民政协报;2013年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 聂鑫;协商民主理论视野中的公共决策问题研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
,本文编号:1937183
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/1937183.html