从券书到契纸——中国传统契约的物质载体与形式演变初探
发布时间：2018-08-14 12:38
【摘要】：在中国传统契约的发展史上,出现了一个从券书(竹木契约)到契纸(纸质契约)的重大形制变化。物质载体的根本性转变,还伴随着契约书写形式的明显变化。由于纸契具有独特的征信功能,无须采取券书合验的方式,唐代以后绝大多数的契约为单契,其中卖契又占据主流地位。这部分归因于契约双方经济地位的不对等,另外,唐代的土地交易法令也对卖契形式的确立起到重要作用。考察中国传统契约的形制变化,有助于避免以西方契约理论盲目套用于传统契约的不当做法。
[Abstract]:In the history of the development of Chinese traditional contract, there has been a great change in form from voucher (bamboo contract) to paper contract (paper contract). The fundamental change of material carrier is accompanied by obvious changes in the form of contract writing. Because the paper deed has the unique function of credit investigation, it does not need to adopt the method of certificate book and check. After the Tang Dynasty, most of the contracts are single deed, among which the selling contract occupies the mainstream position. This is partly due to the unequal economic status of both parties to the contract, in addition, the land transaction law of the Tang Dynasty also played an important role in establishing the form of the lease of sale. It is helpful to avoid the improper practice of applying the western contract theory blindly to the traditional contract.
【作者单位】： 上海立信会计学院文法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目:10YJC820113
【分类号】：K877
[Abstract]:In the history of the development of Chinese traditional contract, there has been a great change in form from voucher (bamboo contract) to paper contract (paper contract). The fundamental change of material carrier is accompanied by obvious changes in the form of contract writing. Because the paper deed has the unique function of credit investigation, it does not need to adopt the method of certificate book and check. After the Tang Dynasty, most of the contracts are single deed, among which the selling contract occupies the mainstream position. This is partly due to the unequal economic status of both parties to the contract, in addition, the land transaction law of the Tang Dynasty also played an important role in establishing the form of the lease of sale. It is helpful to avoid the improper practice of applying the western contract theory blindly to the traditional contract.
【作者单位】： 上海立信会计学院文法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目:10YJC820113
【分类号】：K877
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 李祝环;中国传统民事契约中的中人现象[J];法学研究;1997年06期
2 霍存福;;再论中国古代契约与国家法的关系——以唐代田宅、奴婢卖买契约为中心[J];法制与社会发展;2006年06期
3 俞江;“契约”与“合同”之辨——以清代契约文书为出发点[J];中国社会科学;2003年06期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 马予超,张家合;《文心雕龙·章句》的虚词观及其影响[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2004年02期
2 裴新平,潘祥辉;今本《南齐书》几例点读问题探析[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2004年02期
3 冯莉;;汉晋诸子“论”体考述——以《文心雕龙·论说》为中心[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期
4 卞利;;明清徽州经济活动中的乡例举隅[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期
5 李永贤;;论廖燕“愤气说”的内涵及意义[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年01期
6 刘道胜;;明清徽州合同契约与民间合约关系[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年01期
7 张振龙;;建安文人用典的创新特征[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年02期
8 束莉;;汉晋文化思潮演进中的谯郡夏侯氏家族[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年02期
9 李德新;;唐代火灾及防治措施[J];合肥师范学院学报;2009年04期
10 储小e，
本文编号：2182885
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/2182885.html
