《资本论》阐释中的辉格史观批判

发布时间：2018-03-30 16:23

  本文选题：《资本论》　切入点：辉格史观　出处：《哲学基础理论研究》2015年01期

【摘要】：巴特菲尔德所揭示的"辉格史观"针对的是以"当下"作为"过去"的判断标准,忽视了历史的多样性与具体性的历史研究范式;《资本论》阐释中的辉格史观,则是将马克思在《资本论》中所构造的"特殊对象的特殊逻辑"视为"一般对象的一般逻辑",进而将"思想的具体"视为"现实的具体",因此导致了一系列的误读。"辉格史观"的无奈在于同时兼顾"历史的具体"与"历史的总体"、"过去"与"现在"的两难。要建构起切合当代中国现实的理论图景,就必须走出《资本论》阐释中的辉格史观。
[Abstract]:Butterfield's "Whig's view of history" aims at "the present" as the criterion of "past", neglecting the historical research paradigm of diversity and concreteness of history, and the historical view of Whig in the interpretation of Capital.The "special logic of special object" constructed by Marx in Capital is regarded as "general logic of general object", and "concrete of thought" is regarded as "concrete of reality", which leads to a series of misreading. "The helplessness of Whig's view of history lies in the dilemma of "concrete history" and "historical collectivity", "past" and "present" at the same time.In order to construct a theoretical picture in line with the reality of contemporary China, we must go out of the historical view of Whig in the interpretation of Capital.
【作者单位】： 南开大学哲学院;
【分类号】：A811
，

本文编号：1686683