历史叙述:从表现的观点看——安克斯密特“历史表现”观述评
发布时间：2018-12-13 20:57
【摘要】：围绕"历史表现"这一核心概念,安克斯密特对史学叙述文本进行了深入的论述与分析。其观点要义,是强调文本在语义上并非其中所包含的具有明确指称的陈述语句的逻辑总和,因此,历史叙述不是过去的摹仿镜象,而是历史实在由之被形塑、建构,其意义得以澄明的语言文本。在此基础上,安氏明确提出从表现的观点看待史学文本的理论主张,强调关于历史事实的真实陈述是史学文本的起点而非终点,历史叙述更深刻的内涵乃在于为我们理解历史提供更多、更宽广的视角和更独特的理解样式。安克斯密特从历史哲学出发,在本体论高度上探讨了语言与存在的关系,揭示出史学与美学的内在会通之处。但是,在诸如句子与文本的联系以及史学表现与艺术表现的关系等问题上,其观点和论证尚有未尽之处,这为今后进一步的探讨留下了理论空间。
[Abstract]:Focusing on the core concept of "historical performance", Ankersmitt deeply discusses and analyzes the narrative text of historiography. The main point of its point of view is to emphasize that the text is not the logical sum of the explicit statements contained in it. Therefore, historical narration is not the mirror image of the past, but the history is shaped and constructed by it. A language text in which its meaning can be clarified. On the basis of this, Ann clearly puts forward the theory of viewing the historical text from the viewpoint of expression, emphasizing that the true statement of historical facts is the starting point but not the end of the historical text. The deeper connotation of historical narration lies in providing us with more, broader perspectives and more unique understanding styles. From the perspective of historical philosophy, Ankersmitt explores the relationship between language and existence from the perspective of ontology, and reveals the internal connection between historiography and aesthetics. However, on the issues such as the relation between sentence and text and the relationship between historical expression and artistic expression, there are still some uncompleted points of view and argumentation, which leaves a theoretical space for further discussion in the future.
【作者单位】： 厦门大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“历史与叙述”(08BZX046)
【分类号】：K0
本文编号：2377229
[Abstract]:Focusing on the core concept of "historical performance", Ankersmitt deeply discusses and analyzes the narrative text of historiography. The main point of its point of view is to emphasize that the text is not the logical sum of the explicit statements contained in it. Therefore, historical narration is not the mirror image of the past, but the history is shaped and constructed by it. A language text in which its meaning can be clarified. On the basis of this, Ann clearly puts forward the theory of viewing the historical text from the viewpoint of expression, emphasizing that the true statement of historical facts is the starting point but not the end of the historical text. The deeper connotation of historical narration lies in providing us with more, broader perspectives and more unique understanding styles. From the perspective of historical philosophy, Ankersmitt explores the relationship between language and existence from the perspective of ontology, and reveals the internal connection between historiography and aesthetics. However, on the issues such as the relation between sentence and text and the relationship between historical expression and artistic expression, there are still some uncompleted points of view and argumentation, which leaves a theoretical space for further discussion in the future.
【作者单位】： 厦门大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“历史与叙述”(08BZX046)
【分类号】：K0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 彭刚;;当代西方史学理论中的安克斯密特[J];史学理论研究;2011年03期
2 ;[J];;年期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 顾晓伟;;历史学的中庸之道:融通“历史解释”与“历史表现”的尝试——重思“亨佩尔-德雷论战”的现代意义[A];第八届北京大学史学论坛论文集[C];2012年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 周建漳 厦门大学哲学系;当代西方历史哲学一览[N];中国社会科学报;2010年
，本文编号：2377229
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2377229.html
