史实与想象:“嘉隆王插旗”说质疑

发布时间：2018-07-28 08:47

【摘要】："嘉隆王插旗"说是越南声称拥有西沙群岛主权的主要论据。由于此说的特殊性质,它成为判定西沙群岛主权归属的焦点问题之一。一方面,对"嘉隆王插旗"说的考证和辨析在很大程度上等同于对相关的三个欧洲人生平和记载的可信度的考察;另一方面,在有关帕拉塞尔的地理知识的讨论中,需要借鉴晚近以来从科学史,特别是地理学史中发展出的引入社会和空间维度的思路。本文认为,所谓"嘉隆王插旗"说实为法国传教士塔尔伯特借鉴他所熟知的欧洲常规,通过夸张的想象,把从他人那里获知的阮朝"黄沙队"的活动虚构成了一场威严雄壮的占领行为。19世纪早期的越南不具备科学测绘的物质条件和技术准备,也不具备产生现代意义上的领土主权思想的意识基础。越南方面通过"嘉隆王插旗"说而主张对西沙群岛的主权是脱离历史的谬论。
[Abstract]:King Garon is the main argument for Vietnam's claim to the Paracel Islands. Because of the special nature of this theory, it has become one of the focal issues in determining the sovereignty of the Paracel Islands. On the one hand, the textual research and differentiation of the theory of "King Jalong and banners" is to a great extent equivalent to the investigation of the life and the credibility of the records of the three Europeans concerned; on the other hand, in the discussion of the geographical knowledge of Paracel, It is necessary to draw lessons from the social and spatial dimensions developed from the history of science, especially the history of geography. In this paper, it is believed that the so-called "King Calon planting flag" theory is actually used by Talbot, a French missionary, as a reference to the European conventions he is familiar with, through exaggerated imagination. The activities of Ruan Chao's "Yellow Sand team" learned from others were fictitious as a majestic occupation. Vietnam in the early 19th century did not possess the material conditions and technical preparations for scientific mapping. Also does not have the consciousness foundation which produces the modern sense territory sovereignty thought. Vietnam claims sovereignty over the Paracel Islands through the theory of "King Garon planting flags", which is a fallacy separated from history.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学历史系;
【基金】：2015年度上海市哲学社会科学规划青年课题“地图学史视角下的西沙群岛测绘与主权”
【分类号】：D815.3

【参考文献】