“去安全化”理论的逻辑与路径分析

发布时间：2019-08-07 16:25

【摘要】："去安全化"被哥本哈根学派视为一种长期内应该实现的目标,但一直处于被忽视的境地,当前世界出现得更多的是"安全化"而非"去安全化"。此种状况的形成,在很大程度上与"安全化"理论的自身缺陷有关。正是因为安全被视为一种主体间建构的言语行为,不愿意失去对资源与权力掌控的安全施动者才有机会延滞甚至阻止"去安全化"进程,而缺乏权力与利益聚合的听众常常对此无能无力。所以,要实现"去安全化"进程,就必须在理性主义的基础上重构客观的安全概念,一方面满足当前安全多样化的需要,另一方面反映一个国家在特定阶段、特定情势下的紧迫安全需求。与此同时,应该在接受客观安全概念的基础上,以沟通理性指引,通过对安全施动者的改良、促使听众更加理解为具体路径,推动两者建立有利于启动和完成"去安全化"进程的良性互动机制。
[Abstract]:The "desafety" was seen as a long-term goal of the Copenhagen school, but it has been in a neglected position, and the current world has more than a "safety" rather than a "desafety". The formation of this kind of situation is related to the self-defect of the "safety" theory to a great extent. It is because the security is regarded as a speech act between the main bodies, and it is not willing to lose the security application to control the resources and power to delay or even prevent the "desafety" process, and the lack of power and interest aggregation is often weak. Therefore, to realize the "desafety" process, it is necessary to reconstruct the objective security concept on the basis of rationalism, on the one hand, to meet the needs of the current security and diversification, and on the other hand, to reflect the urgent security requirements of a country in a specific stage and in a specific situation. At the same time, on the basis of the concept of objective security, the audience should be more understood as a specific path through the improvement of the security application, and both of them should be promoted to establish a benign interaction mechanism that is conducive to the start-up and completion of the "desafety" process.
【作者单位】：上海社会科学院国际关系研究所;
【基金】：笔者主持的国家社会科学基金项目“中美东亚冲突管控机制研究”(14BGJ050)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D81

【参考文献】