气候变化应对策略对大学生亲环境行为的影响

发布时间：2017-12-26 18:16

本文关键词：气候变化应对策略对大学生亲环境行为的影响　出处：《云南师范大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：气候变化应对策略是个体或群体应对气候变化的方法或方式。当前的研究发现,气候变化应对策略主要有两种:情绪聚焦应对、问题聚焦应对。情绪聚焦应对是指通过恐惧、回避以及疏远等常见的情感策略来否认气候变化压力源、摆脱由应激引发的负面情绪。问题聚焦应对通过搜寻问题解决信息,制定相应的行动计划和具体措施来提高自我效能感或群体效能感以应对气候变化问题。亲环境行为以个人责任感和价值观为基础,其目的是为了保护或解决各种环境问题。气候变化的情绪—问题双路径应对模型认为,以提高群体效能感为主的问题聚焦应对在增加亲环境行为方面有显著作用,而以恐惧为主的情绪聚焦应对也能直接影响个体产生更多的环境行为,但问题聚焦与情绪聚焦对个体亲环境行为的影响作用是独立的,不存在交互效应。已有研究主要考察恐惧这一情绪聚焦应对策略,缺乏对否认等策略的考察;并且对气候应对策略是如何影响亲环境行为的作用机制问题仍然不清楚。本研究通过三个实验,分别考察了以否认和群体效能作为操作指标,探讨情绪—问题聚焦应对与亲环境行为的关系,并探讨个体满意度在气候应对策略影响亲环境行为的调节作用。实验1采用2(恐惧:有/无)×2(群体效能感:有/无)被试间设计,将130名大学生随机分成4组,检验了气候变化的情绪—问题双路径应对模型能否在中国大学生中得到验证。结果发现,恐惧作为情绪聚焦应对可以有效促进大学生被试的亲环境行为意向,群体效能感作为问题聚焦应对也能显著促进亲环境行为意向,并且两种应对策略相互独立,并没有发生交互作用。实验2采用2(否认:有/无)×2(负性群体效能感:有/无)被试间设计,将136名大学生随机分成4组,分别考察否认、群体效能与大学生亲环境行为意向、亲环境Shijiazhuang行为的关系,考察否认—群体效能对亲环境行为意向、实际行为的交互作用。结果发现,否认作为情绪聚焦应对可以有效抑制大学生被试的亲环境行为意向,群体效能感作为问题聚焦应对也能显著影响亲环境行为意向,并且两种气候变化应对策略相互独立,并没有发生交互作用。进一步分析得知,大学生亲环境行为意向能够较好代表他们的亲环境实际行为,因此,可以认为,气候变化应对策略可以通过影响个体行为意向,来预测亲环境实际行为。实验3采用2(否认信息:有/无)×2(负性群体效能感信息:有/无)被试间设计,将150名大学生随机分成4组,在完成相应的实验任务之后,测量其满意度和亲环境行为意向反应。结果发现,否认气候变化、群体效能与个体满意度之间的相关都很低,即否认和负性群体效能与满意度之间不存在直接关系。进一步的多元回归分析发现,大学生被试的满意度能对应对策略与亲环境行为起到调节作用,证明了满意度与双路径模型之间的关系。综上所述,主要得到以下结论:1.气候变化双路径应对模型具有跨文化适应性。情绪聚焦应对和问题聚焦应对能够独立影响大学生的亲环境行为意向,并且不发生交互作用,2.当气候变化的情绪聚焦应对为否认时,可能抑制大学生的亲环境行为意向。当气候变化的问题聚焦策略为负性群体效能时,也可以抑制个体亲环境行为意向。3.气候变化应对策略对个体亲环境行为的影响,受到个人满意度的调节。4.双路径模型通过提升行为意向来预测亲环境实际行为。
[Abstract]:Climate change coping strategy is a way or way for individuals or groups to cope with climate change. The current research has found that there are two main coping strategies for climate change: emotional focused coping and problem focused coping. Emotional focused coping is to deny the stressors of climate change and get rid of the negative emotions caused by stress through common affective strategies such as fear, avoidance and estrangement. We should focus on coping with climate change by focusing on solving problems through searching problems, formulating corresponding action plans and specific measures to improve self-efficacy or group efficacy. On the basis of personal sense of responsibility and values, the purpose of Pro environmental behavior is to protect or solve various environmental problems. Think of climate change - double path emotional coping model, in order to improve the group efficacy problem focused coping mainly has a significant role in increasing the pro environmental behavior, and emotion focused coping with fear based can directly affect the individual environmental behavior more, but the problem focused and emotion focused is independent of the influence on the individual Pro environmental behavior, there is no interaction effect. Previous studies have mainly focused on fear focused coping strategies, lack of strategies such as denial and so on, and the mechanism of how climate coping strategies affect environmental behaviors is still unclear. In this study, three experiments were conducted to investigate the relationship between emotional problem focused coping and pro environmental behavior, and explore the moderating effect of individual satisfaction on coping strategies. In Experiment 1, 2 (fear: Yes / no) x 2 (group efficacy: Yes / no) subjects were designed, and 130 college students were randomly divided into 4 groups. The results showed that fear as an emotional focused coping strategy can effectively promote the behavior intention of college students. Group efficacy as a problem focused coping strategy can significantly promote Pro environment behavior intention, and the two coping strategies are independent, and there is no interaction. Experiment 2 used 2 (denied: Yes / no) * 2 (negative group efficacy: Yes / no) between subjects design, 136 college students were randomly divided into 4 groups, respectively, denied the group efficacy and students Pro environmental behavior intention, pro environment behavior Shijiazhuang, study group denied the effectiveness of Pro environmental behavior intention and actual behavior interaction. The results showed that as the denial of emotion focused coping can effectively restrain the subjects of Pro environmental behavior intention, group efficacy as problem focused coping can significantly affect the pro environmental behavior intention, and two kinds of climate change strategies are independent of each other, and no interaction. Further analysis shows that college students' Pro environmental behavior intentions can better represent their real environmental behaviors. Therefore, it can be considered that coping strategies of climate change can predict the pro environmental behaviors through influencing individual behavioral intentions. In Experiment 3, 2 (denial of information: have / no) x 2 (negative group efficacy information: Yes / no) was designed, and 150 college students were randomly divided into 4 groups. After completing the corresponding experimental tasks, their satisfaction and behavior responses were measured. It is found that there is a low correlation between denial of climate change, group effectiveness and individual satisfaction, that is, there is no direct relationship between denial and negative group efficacy and satisfaction. Further multiple regression analysis showed that the satisfaction degree of college students can play a moderating role in coping strategies and pro environment behaviors, proving the relationship between satisfaction and dual path model. To sum up, the main conclusions are as follows: 1. the climate change dual path coping model has cross-cultural adaptability. Emotional focused coping and problem focused coping can independently affect college students' Pro environmental behavior intentions, and there is no interaction. 2., when climate change focuses on coping, it may inhibit college students' Pro environmental behavior intentions. When the focus strategy of climate change is negative group efficiency, it can also restrain individual environmental behavior intention. 3. the impact of climate change coping strategies on individual environmental behavior is regulated by personal satisfaction. The 4. dual path model predicts the actual behavior of the environment by promoting behavioral intentions.
【学位授予单位】：云南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：B842.6;P467

【参考文献】