损耗敏感性量表中文版的修订与信效度研究

发布时间：2018-03-05 06:52

本文选题：损耗敏感性　切入点：自我损耗　出处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2017年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的:对损耗敏感性量表(DSS)中文版进行修订并检验其信效度。方法:选取北京市某高校499名研究生,随机分为两部分,一部分(n=249)用于条目分析与探索性因子分析,另一部分(n=250)用于验证性因子分析与信效度检验;以自我调节疲劳量表(SRF-S)、自我控制双系统量表(DMSCS)与青少年生活事件量表(ASLEC)为效标检验效标效度;2周后随机选取其中280名研究生进行重测以检验重测信度。结果:量表中文版包含8个条目,分为认知与行为2个维度,共解释60.7%的方差变异;验证性因素分析显示,双因素模型具有良好的拟合(χ~2/df=4.18,RMSEA=0.09,NFI=0.95,NNFI=0.94,CFI=0.96,IFI=0.96,GFI=0.96,SRMR=0.05)。量表总分及2个维度得分与SRF-S的各分量表得分、DMSC-S冲动系统分量表得分、ASLEC的各分量表(除学习压力外)得分均呈正相关(r=0.13~0.55,均P0.001)。总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.80,2个维度的Cronbachα系数为0.79、0.73;总量表的重测信度为0.52,2个维度的重测信度为0.46、0.58。结论:损耗敏感性量表中文版具有良好的心理测量学指标,适宜在研究生群体中使用。
[Abstract]:Objective: to revise the Chinese version of the loss sensitivity scale (DSS) and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: 499 graduate students from a university in Beijing were randomly divided into two parts, one of which was used for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis. The other part is used for confirmatory factor analysis and reliability and validity test. Two weeks later, 280 graduate students were randomly selected to retest the validity of SRF-SU, DMSCSand Adolescent Life events scale (ASLEC) to test the test-retest reliability. Results:. The Chinese version of the table contains eight entries, The variance variation of 60.7% was explained by cognitive and behavioral dimensions, and confirmatory factor analysis showed that, The two-factor model has a good fit (蠂 ~ 2 / 2 DfU 4.18 / RMSEAA 0.09 / NNFI0.95 / NNFI0.94 / CFI0.96F / F ~ 0.96F ~ (0.96F)). The total score and two dimension scores of the scale are positively correlated with the scores of the SRF-S subscale DMSC-S impulse system subscale (except for learning stress), the scores of ASLEC are positively correlated with the scores of 0.130.55 and P0.0010.55. The total score of the scale and the scores of the two dimensions are positively correlated with the scores of each subscale of SRF-S (except for the learning pressure). The Cronbach 伪 coefficient was 0.80, the Cronbach 伪 coefficient of two dimensions was 0.79 ~ 0.73, the test-retest reliability of total scale was 0.52, and the test-retest reliability of two dimensions was 0.460.58.Conclusion: the Chinese version of loss sensitivity scale has good psychometric index. Suitable for use in graduate students.
【作者单位】：中国科学院心理健康重点实验室中国科学院心理研究所;中国科学院大学;
【分类号】：B841.7

【相似文献】