自主性、自发性思维游移与学业情绪的关系
发布时间：2019-06-24 11:39
【摘要】：思维游移是当个体的注意力从当前主要任务或外部任务中脱离,并指向内部生成的思考和想法的心理过程和状态。但研究者在要求被试进行主动和被动的思维游移报告的过程中发现,思维游移存在可以被意识和控制的成分。研究者根据个体的控制或者意识参与程度将这两种类型赋予了可操作化的名称:自主性思维游移(Mind wandering:Deliberately)和自发性思维游移(Mind wandering:Spontaneously)。本文首先对自主性、自发性思维游移量表的中文版进行了修订,该量表包括两个分量表:自主性思维游移量表(MW-D)和自发性思维游移量表(MW-S)。总体量表和两个分量表的信效度良好,适合用于中国学生。使用自主性、自发性思维游移量表,以及中学生学业情绪量表,调查了375名中学生。将自主性思维游移和自发性思维游移做了区分,考察两种思维游移对学业情绪的影响的差异。结果表明:1)自主性思维游移与积极学业情绪总体呈正相关,但是无法预测积极学业情绪,自主性思维游移对学业情绪不存在预测作用。2)自发性思维游移与积极学业情绪总体负相关,与消极学业情绪总体正相关,自主性思维游移能够抑制积极学业情绪,预测消极学业情绪。
[Abstract]:The shift of thinking is the psychological process and state of the individual's attention from the current main task or the external task and pointing to the thought and thought of the internal generation. But the researchers found in the course of asking the participants to take active and passive thought-shifting reports that the thought-shifting presence can be recognized and controlled. The researchers assigned these two types to an operable name based on the individual's control or the degree of awareness: This paper first revised the Chinese version of the self-contained, spontaneous-thinking-shift scale, which includes two component tables: the autonomous-thinking-shift scale (MW-D) and the spontaneous-thinking-shift scale (MW-S). The overall scale and the two component tables have good validity and are suitable for Chinese students. A total of 375 middle school students were investigated by using the self-determination, the self-thinking swim-shift scale, and the middle school students' academic emotion scale. The difference of the influence of the two kinds of thinking to the academic emotion was studied by the distinction between the self-thinking and the spontaneous thinking. The results showed that:1) The movement of the autonomous thinking was positively related to the positive academic mood, but it was not possible to predict the positive academic mood, and the self-independent thinking of thinking did not play a predictive role in the academic emotion.2) The spontaneous thinking movement was negatively related to the positive academic mood. It is positively related to the negative academic emotion, and the self-thinking movement can restrain the positive academic emotion and predict the negative academic emotion.
【学位授予单位】：山西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842
本文编号：2505033
[Abstract]:The shift of thinking is the psychological process and state of the individual's attention from the current main task or the external task and pointing to the thought and thought of the internal generation. But the researchers found in the course of asking the participants to take active and passive thought-shifting reports that the thought-shifting presence can be recognized and controlled. The researchers assigned these two types to an operable name based on the individual's control or the degree of awareness: This paper first revised the Chinese version of the self-contained, spontaneous-thinking-shift scale, which includes two component tables: the autonomous-thinking-shift scale (MW-D) and the spontaneous-thinking-shift scale (MW-S). The overall scale and the two component tables have good validity and are suitable for Chinese students. A total of 375 middle school students were investigated by using the self-determination, the self-thinking swim-shift scale, and the middle school students' academic emotion scale. The difference of the influence of the two kinds of thinking to the academic emotion was studied by the distinction between the self-thinking and the spontaneous thinking. The results showed that:1) The movement of the autonomous thinking was positively related to the positive academic mood, but it was not possible to predict the positive academic mood, and the self-independent thinking of thinking did not play a predictive role in the academic emotion.2) The spontaneous thinking movement was negatively related to the positive academic mood. It is positively related to the negative academic emotion, and the self-thinking movement can restrain the positive academic emotion and predict the negative academic emotion.
【学位授予单位】：山西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 鞠恩霞;张晏宁;罗扬眉;;心理游离问卷中文版的修订及其信效度研究[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2016年01期
2 程凯;曹贵康;;走神的理论假设、影响因素及其神经机制[J];心理科学进展;2014年09期
3 刘影;刘佳佳;张扩滕;龚少英;;初中生学业归因方式、学业情绪与心理健康[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2014年05期
4 李雨;舒华;;默认网络的神经机制、功能假设及临床应用[J];心理科学进展;2014年02期
5 陈京军;李三福;;初中生成就归因、学业情绪预测学业成绩的路径[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2012年03期
6 赵淑媛;蔡太生;陈志坚;;大学生学业情绪及与学业成绩的关系[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2012年03期
7 陈思佚;崔红;周仁来;贾艳艳;;正念注意觉知量表(MAAS)的修订及信效度检验[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2012年02期
8 胡楠荼;许百华;;心智游移的研究:理论、方法及进展[J];应用心理学;2012年01期
9 马惠霞;刘美廷;张非易;;理性情绪教育改善高一学生的学业情绪[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2012年01期
10 张玉;何成森;吕晓萍;;初中生学业情绪相关因素分析[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2011年12期
，本文编号：2505033
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2505033.html
