纠错性反馈对不同工作记忆容量学生的影响研究

发布时间：2023-04-21 22:08

　　纠错性反馈一直是二语习得领域研究的热门话题,许多研究者都致力于研究纠错性反馈的有效性,但到目前为止并无定论。原因就在于语言学习是一个复杂的认知过程,个体的认知差异对语言学习的效果起着至关重要的作用。因此本研究尝试将认知因素―工作记忆考虑在内去探讨工作记忆容量的有效性。本研究尝试去探索是否纠错性反馈对不同工作记忆容量的学生有显著不同的效果,然后再进一步研究对于工作记忆容量高的学生来说,哪种反馈效果较好以及对于工作记忆容量低的学生来说,哪种反馈效果较好。本研究采用定量研究方法,以虚拟语气为目标语言结构,选取河北正定中学60名高二学生作为被试进行了为期五周的实验,通过SPSS(13.0版本)对收集的实验数据进行分析,发现工作记忆容量作为认知因素,对于纠错性反馈(重述和元语言反馈)的效果具有影响作用。即同一种纠错性反馈对于工作记忆容量高的学生的效果显著好于工作记忆容量低的学生。同时对于工作记忆容量高的学生,元语言提示的效果略微好于重述反馈,但是这两种反馈方式的效果并未形成显著性差异。而工作记忆容量低的学生,两种纠错性反馈(重述和元语言提示)则具有显著性差异。元语言提示的效果显著好于重述。本研究...

【文章页数】：57 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
List of Abbreviation
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Background and purpose of the study
    1.2 Structure of the thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Corrective feedback
        2.1.1 Definition of corrective feedback
        2.1.2 Classification of corrective feedback
        2.1.3 Recast and metalinguistic feedback
    2.2 Working memory capacity
        2.2.1 Introduction of working memory
        2.2.2 Measurement of working memory capacity
    2.3 Related studies at home and abroad
        2.3.1 Studies on corrective feedback at home and abroad
        2.3.2 Studies on the interaction between working memory capacity and theeffects of corrective feedback at home and abroad
    2.4 Theoretical background
        2.4.1 The noticing hypothesis
        2.4.2 The resource sharing theory
Chapter Three Research Design
    3.1 Research questions
    3.2 Research participants
    3.3 Research Instruments
        3.3.1 Listening span test
        3.3.2 Pretest and posttest
    3.4 Research procedures
        3.4.1 Listening span test
        3.4.2 Pretest
        3.4.3 Corrective Feedback Treatment
        3.4.4 Posttest
    3.5 Data collection
        3.5.1 Data collection of listening span test
        3.5.2 Data collection of pretest and posttest
    3.6 Data analysis
Chapter Four Results and Discussion
    4.1 Results
        4.1.1 Descriptive statistics of listening span test
        4.1.2 Descriptive statistics of pretest
        4.1.3 Descriptive statistics of posttest
    4.2 Discussion
        4.2.1 Discussion on research question one
        4.2.2 Discussion on research question two
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major findings
    5.2 Implications
    5.3 Limitations of the study and suggestions for suture studies
References
Appendix Ⅰ Listening Span Test
Appendix Ⅱ Pretest
Appendix Ⅲ Post-test
Appendix Ⅳ Oral Translation Task
Acknowledgements



本文编号：3796337