试论宜兴亳村陈于泰的评价失真问题

发布时间：2018-02-11 21:48

本文关键词： 陈于泰明末清初士人评价　出处：《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学版)》2013年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：一般而言,士大夫在王朝更迭之际对新朝故国的态度及表现,应是其获得历史评价的第一依据,但也不尽然,明末清初宜兴亳村的陈于泰就是一个例子。某种程度而言,宜兴民变实际上已经给陈于泰的道德形象定了格,并使其成了晚明缙绅贪婪形象的符号。更可悲的是,随着明亡之后汉族士人痛定思痛、自我反省的不断深入,加之新朝的有意渲染,陈于泰的这一形象不仅在身后毫无反转的可能,反而还被继续强化。陈于泰在明清鼎革中的真实表现,自然也被有意无意地忽视。这一实例提醒我们,由于明清之际的特殊性和复杂性,这一时期的士人评价之难度要远远超出一般。
[Abstract]:Generally speaking, the attitude and performance of the literati and officials towards the old country of the new dynasty at the time of the change of dynasty should be the first basis for its historical evaluation, but it is not quite the same. Chen Yutai of Yixing Bo Village in late Ming and early Qing Dynasty is an example. To some extent, Chen Yutai is a case in point. The Yixing people's Rebellion has in fact established Chen Yutai's moral image and made it a symbol of the greedy image of the gentry in the late Ming Dynasty. What is more sad is that with the Han Chinese scholars after the death of the Ming Dynasty, the self-reflection continued to deepen. In addition to the intentional rendering of the new dynasty, this image of Chen Yutai is not only without the possibility of reversal behind, but also continues to be strengthened. Chen Yutai's true performance during the Ming and Qing dynasties was naturally ignored, intentionally or unintentionally. This example reminds us that. Due to the particularity and complexity of the Ming and Qing dynasties, the evaluation of scholars in this period was far more difficult than general.
【作者单位】：南京大学历史学系;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大招标项目“江南地域文化的历史演进”(10&ZD069) 南京大学人文基金项目“宜兴民变与明末江南缙绅研究”
【分类号】：K248

【共引文献】