欧阳修经学思想研究

发布时间：2018-04-12 12:48

本文选题：欧阳修 + 经学　；参考：《浙江大学》2007年博士论文

【摘要】： 北宋庆历前后,经学处于“大变”时代。这一时期的欧阳修,不仅在政治上通过对科举考试的命题及对“宋初三先生”的荐引,推动了经学新风气(义理经学)的发展和传播;而且在学术上著书立说,首先打破了旧的经学传统,提出了新的经学理论。在北宋庆历前后的儒学复兴与经学转型(由汉学转向宋学)过程中实起着领袖的作用。本文试图通过对欧阳修经学思想的全面整理与发掘,辨明其经学渊源,勾勒其经学全貌,还原欧阳修在儒学与经学史上的地位与作用。本文“绪论”部分概述了前人有关欧阳修经学思想的研究情况,指出宋代义理之学的开端在于庆历年间,但对于这一时期经学的研究大多囿于旧理学传统的说法,以“宋初三先生”为宋学开端。实际上,欧阳修才是儒学复兴与经学转型的领袖人物。正文部分由六章组成。第一章“欧阳修经学思想的形成与发展”,以欧阳修被贬“夷陵”和“滁州”两次时间为界,分为“自小读经,经学仕宦”、“厌众说乱经,大胆怀疑”以及“著书成说,推动宋学发展”三个阶段,论述欧阳修经学思想的形成发展情况。第二章“欧阳修的《易》学思想”,首先分析论述了欧阳修《易》学思想的疑古特点,其次论述了其解《易》的理论方法,然后通过对欧阳修《易童子问》所论各卦与王弼注释比较,指出两者的异同。第三章“欧阳修的《诗经》学思想”,首先论述了欧阳修《诗经》学发展的背景,其次论述了欧阳修对《诗经》的具体认识、“求诗本义”的解诗方法,辨析了欧阳修对《序》、《传》、《笺》的批评以及欧阳修对《诗经》时世的考订,最后对欧阳修《诗经》学研究中的几个重要问题作了辩证分析,指出欧阳修前后《诗经》学思想的不一致处,澄清了前人的一些误解。第四章“欧阳修的《春秋》学思想”,首先论述了唐中叶至宋初的《春秋》学发展背景,其次分析了欧阳修对于“三传”与“经”关系的认识,辨析了欧阳修关于“《春秋》笔法”与“《春秋》大义”的理论,最后论述了欧阳修《春秋》学思想对其史学思想的具体影响第五章“欧阳修的《书》、《礼》、《尔雅》及四书学思想”,研究探讨欧阳修关于《周礼》、《尚书》、《尔雅》、《礼记》以及“四书”中的《论语》、《中庸》和《孟子》等方面的思想,指出欧阳修不仅重视传统的“六经”之学,而且对当时处丁兴起阶段的“四书”学也有重要的贡献。本文中关于欧阳修《礼记》、《论语》及《孟子》思想的研究是对欧阳修经学思想研究的新拓展,填补了前人研究欧阳修的空白。第六章“儒学复兴运动中的欧阳修”,通过对欧阳修经学思想的归纳,指出欧阳修对宋初“道统”、“文统”、“正统”理论建立的作用与贡献。
[Abstract]:Before and after the Northern Song Dynasty Qing calendar, the study of Confucian classics was in the era of "great change".In this period, Ouyang Xiu not only promoted the development and dissemination of the new ethos of Confucian classics through the proposition of imperial examination and the introduction of "Mr. three of Song Dynasty" in politics, but also wrote books and theories academically.First of all, it breaks the old tradition of classics and puts forward a new theory of classics.The revival of Confucianism and the transformation of Confucian classics (from Sinology to Song School) played a leading role in the Northern Song Dynasty.This paper attempts to identify the origin of Ouyang Xiu's Confucian classics through the comprehensive arrangement and exploration of his thought of Confucian classics, to outline the whole picture of his studies of classics, and to restore the position and role of Ouyang Xiu in the history of Confucianism and Confucian classics.In the introduction part of this paper, the author summarizes the previous studies on Ouyang Xiu's Confucian classics, and points out that the beginning of the study of righteousness and theory in the Song Dynasty lies in the Qing Dynasty, but the study of the Confucian classics in this period is mostly confined to the theory of the old Neo-Confucianism tradition.The beginning of Song School is "the third Mr. of the Song Dynasty".In fact, Ouyang Xiu is the leading figure in the revival of Confucianism and the transformation of Confucian classics.The body is composed of six chapters.The first chapter, "the formation and development of Ouyang Xiu's thought of Confucian classics", divided into "reading the classics since his childhood, studying the official officials of the classics", "disgust with the numerous theories of confusion, daring to doubt" and "writing the book into saying", taking the two times as the boundary of the demoted "Yiling" and "Chuzhou".Three stages of promoting the development of Song School, this paper discusses the formation and development of Ouyang Xiu's thought of Confucian Classics.The second chapter, "Ouyang Xiu's thought of Yi", firstly analyzes and discusses the characteristics of Ouyang Xiu's thought of "Yi Yi", and then discusses its theoretical method of solving "Yi".Then, by comparing each hexagram discussed by Ouyang Xiu and Wang Bi, the author points out the similarities and differences between the two.The third chapter, "Ouyang Xiu's study thought of the Book of songs", firstly discusses the background of the development of Ouyang Xiu's study of the Book of songs, and then discusses the concrete understanding of the Book of songs and the method of "seeking the original meaning of poetry".This paper distinguishes and analyzes Ouyang Xiu's criticism of "preface", "biography" and "paper", as well as Ouyang Xiu's textual research on the times and times of the Book of songs, and finally makes a dialectical analysis of several important problems in the study of the Book of songs of Ouyang Xiu.This paper points out the inconsistency of Ouyang Xiu's thought in the Book of songs, and clarifies some misunderstandings of predecessors.In the fourth chapter, "Ouyang Xiu's thoughts on the study of Spring and Autumn", the author first discusses the background of the development of "Spring and Autumn" from the middle of Tang Dynasty to the beginning of Song Dynasty, and then analyzes the understanding of the relationship between "three legends" and "the Classics" by Ouyang Xiu.This paper distinguishes and analyzes Ouyang Xiu's theory of "the Spring and Autumn period" and "the Great meaning of the Spring and Autumn period", and finally discusses the concrete influence of the academic thought of Ouyang Xiu "Spring and Autumn" on his thought of historiography.The fifth chapter, "Ouyang Xiu's book", "rite", "er Ya" and "four book learning thoughts", studies and discusses Ouyang Xiu's thoughts on "Zhou Li Li", "Shang Shu", < er ya >, "Book of Rites" and "Analects of Analects", "the mean" and "Mencius" in "four Books", etc.It is pointed out that Ouyang Xiu not only attached importance to the traditional study of the six Classics, but also made an important contribution to the study of the four Books in the rising stage.In this paper, the study of Ouyang Xiu, Analects of Confucius and Mencius is a new extension to the study of Ouyang Xiu's Confucian classics, which fills up the blank of the predecessors' research on Ouyang Xiu.The sixth chapter, Ouyang Xiu in the Confucian Revival Movement, points out the role and contribution of Ouyang Xiu to the establishment of the theory of Taoism, literature and orthodoxy in the early Song Dynasty.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：K244

【参考文献】