《明史断略》作者考辨——兼论《明事断略》与《明史断略》的关系

发布时间：2018-05-14 10:13

  本文选题：钱谦益 + 《明史断略》　； 参考：《史学史研究》2014年03期

【摘要】：现存单卷本《明史断略》,作者署名钱谦益。另有同名四卷本,署名彭而述。两书内容基本相同。有人认为是彭而述对钱著进行了评点与续写,两书相同的部分是彭氏抄袭钱著的。实际上,彭而述撰写《明史断略》是毋庸置疑的。而题名钱谦益所作《明史断略》则从史观、所载史事、人物事迹上与钱氏及其所载大相径庭,显然非出自钱氏之手。署名钱氏单卷本《明史断略》是彭氏《明史断略》抄本的残本。而《明事断略》则是在抄写署名钱氏本的基础上,以自己对史事、人物的认识改窜原文而成。
[Abstract]:The author signed Qian Qianyi. There are also four volumes of the same name, signed by Peng. The content of the two books is basically the same. Some people think it was Peng who wrote and commented on the money. The same part of the two books was copied from money. As a matter of fact, there is no doubt about Peng's writing A short History of the Ming Dynasty. On the other hand, Qian Qianyi's "A short History of Ming Dynasty" is different from Qian's and his stories in the historical view, the historical events and the historical events, which are obviously not by Qian's hand. The signed single volume of Qian is a remnant of Penn's copy of Ming History. On the basis of copying and signing Qian's book, his own understanding of historical events and characters changed to the original text.
【作者单位】： 江苏师范大学历史文化学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“明末清初私家修史研究”(项目编号:11BZS001)阶段性成果
【分类号】：K248
，

本文编号：1887437