论明清时期芍陂的水事纠纷及其治理

发布时间：2018-06-18 22:58

本文选题：明清 + 芍陂　；参考：《中国农史》2015年02期

【摘要】：明清两代,芍陂地区频发水事纠纷,纠纷的类型主要有占垦芍陂纠纷、河源阻坝纠纷、拦沟筑坝纠纷、盗决塘埂纠纷、罾网张?纠纷五种。芍陂多元化水事纠纷的产生,与芍陂水生态环境负向变迁、行政区划与水利边界的矛盾、经济利益的冲突不无关系。针对芍陂多种水事纠纷的不同情况,明清地方官府和民间社会通过修复芍陂、加强芍陂管理、制定芍陂水利规约,以及行政会商调解、行政裁决和处罚、诉讼、立碑示禁等多种方式,本着尊重历史、恢复原状、利益均沾、区别对待的原则,构建起了较为有效的水事纠纷治理机制,一定程度上缓和乃至解决了芍陂水事矛盾冲突,对当地经济社会的稳定与发展,产生了积极意义。
[Abstract]:Ming and Qing dynasties, the area of Shaopi frequent water disputes, the types of disputes are mainly occupied by the settlement of disputes, river source dam-blocking disputes, dam blocking disputes, disputes about stealing the Tangridge dispute, the network of net Zhang? There are five kinds of disputes. The emergence of multiple water disputes in Shao Pei is closely related to the negative changes in the ecological environment of water in Shao Pei, the contradiction between administrative divisions and water conservancy boundaries, and the conflict of economic interests. In view of the different situations of various water disputes in Shao Pei, the local authorities and civil society of the Ming and Qing dynasties through the restoration of Shao Pei, the strengthening of the management of Shao Pei, the formulation of the water conservancy statute of Shaopi, as well as the administrative consultation, mediation, administrative decisions and penalties, and litigation, In line with the principle of respecting history, restoring the status quo ante, and treating each other differently, a more effective mechanism for the management of water disputes has been set up, to a certain extent, to ease or even resolve the contradiction and conflict of the water affair in Pei Pei, Pei Pei, in the light of the principle of respecting history, restoring the status quo ante, and treating it differently. To the stability and development of local economy and society, produced positive meaning.
【作者单位】：安徽大学马克思主义研究院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“建国以来淮河流域水资源环境变迁与水事纠纷问题研究”(14BZS071) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“徽州文化与淮河文化比较研究”(05JJDZH219)
【分类号】：K248;S-09

【参考文献】