明代内书堂考论
发布时间:2018-01-13 08:43
本文关键词:明代内书堂考论 出处:《福建师范大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:关于明朝宦官的研究情况大多是注重人物而不注重制度,注重不好的一面,而忽略好的一面。历史三大宦官时代——汉、唐、明三朝,明朝宦官的气焰最为嚣张,但偏偏明朝宦官没有出现过掠夺皇权的现象,仍然处于皇权的控制下。除了中央集权和皇权的加强,很重要的一个原因是内书堂的设立。内书堂是明代宦官的学校机构,是接受学习教育的地方。因为有了内书堂,明代宦官具有了知识,从而对明朝政治产生了一些与其他朝代不同的作用。研究内书堂设置的原因、时间、名称的演变、以及内书堂的老师、学生、规章制度都有着不同的历史价值。 本文通过研究这些细小的问题,然后进一步延伸到内书堂对明朝宦官素质的影响以及对整个宦官机构的作用,甚至对内外朝之间的联系产生的作用,来说明内书堂的作用。明朝有这样的特点,非翰林不能为大学士,非大学士不入内阁;同样,在宦官升迁上,非内书堂不入文书房,非文书房不入司礼监;而翰林恰恰是内书堂的教师,内书堂的宦官常常又是未来皇帝和皇子皇妃的老师。由内书堂引发的一系列微妙的关系,牵动着明朝的整个政局的走向。换句话说,内书堂这一极小的机构影响着明朝的整个朝局。文章最后笔者再对明朝宦官能够为变而不能为乱的原因做一个大胆的思考。通过内书堂学习的宦官,忠君思想得到强化,故擅权而不夺权,势大而不欺主。
[Abstract]:The research on Ming Dynasty eunuchs is mostly focused on the characters and not pay attention to the system, pay attention to the bad side, while ignoring the good side. The history of the three big eunuch era of Han, Tang, the three dynasties, the Ming Dynasty eunuch arrogance of the most arrogant, but the Ming Dynasty eunuch didn't loot the imperial power, imperial power is still in under the control of. In addition to strengthen the centralization of power and power. A very important reason is the establishment in the book Hall. In the book Hall is the Ming Dynasty eunuch institutions, is learning to accept education. Because the inner seodang, the Ming Dynasty eunuch with knowledge, resulting in a number of different from the other dynasties the role of the Ming Dynasty politics. Time study of inner seodang setting reasons, the development of the name, and the teacher, in the book Hall of students, the rules have different historical value.
Through the study of these small problems, and then further extended to the inner seodang of the Ming Dynasty eunuch quality and the influence of the entire eunuch institution, even on the inside and outside toward the link between the role of the inner seodang role. The Ming Dynasty has such features as non Imperial Academy cannot be a bachelor, non University scholar not into the cabinet; similarly, in the promotion of non eunuch, the book Hall in the study, the study does not enter the silijian; and it is in the hall of the imperial eunuch in the hall of teachers, often is the emperor and the Prince Consort of the teacher in the future. A series of subtle relationships caused by in the book the hall of the Ming Dynasty, affects to the whole political situation. In other words, in the book Hall of this small institution affects the entire Chaoju Ming Dynasty. Finally the author of the Ming Dynasty eunuch can change but can't mess the reason to make a bold thinking through. The eunuch in the book Hall of learning, the conception of loyalty has been strengthened, so good right without power, but not the main bully. Potential
【学位授予单位】:福建师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:K248
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵轶峰;票拟制度与明代政治[J];东北师大学报;1989年02期
2 冷东;明代政治家与宦官关系论略[J];广东社会科学;1995年02期
3 欧阳琛;;明代的司礼监[J];江西师院学报;1983年04期
4 方志远;明代内阁的票拟制度[J];江西师范大学学报;1987年04期
5 方志远;;论明代宦官的知识化问题[J];江西师范大学学报;1989年03期
6 欧阳琛;;明内府内书堂考略——兼论明司礼监和内阁共理朝政[J];江西师范大学学报;1990年02期
7 赵奇;内阁和司礼监——明王朝的两套秘书班子[J];乐山师专学报(社会科学版);1990年02期
8 谢景芳;假皇帝与代管家──朱元璋废相后的明代阁权之争及其批判[J];齐鲁学刊;1996年02期
9 王云;明代女官制度探析[J];齐鲁学刊;1997年01期
10 梁绍杰;明代宦官教育机构的名称和初设时间新证[J];史学集刊;1996年03期
,本文编号:1418305
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/1418305.html