元代《春秋》学著述考论
发布时间：2018-10-29 19:06
【摘要】：《春秋》一直以来被奉为治世平天下的儒家经典,千百年来为学者所重视。《春秋》的研究更是经久不衰,曾未间断,即使是蒙古人统治的仅存一百多年的元代。本文拟对有元一代的《春秋》学著述进行系统全面的梳理与统计,并对其进行简要解题。在此基础上,笔者探讨元代《春秋》学兴起的渊源与历史文化背景,分析《春秋》学学者的地域分布与学术师承概况及其原因,进而总结出元代《春秋》学的整体特征以及学术史上的地位与影响。元代之前,《春秋》学经历了汉学和宋学两次发展的高峰,学者研究《春秋》的范式也由汉唐时期的“以文解经”发展为两宋时期的“以义解经”。元代统一之后,统治者实行“以儒治国”的文化政策,积极招揽儒生。南儒赵复北上为北方带来了程朱之学,加上元代科举考试的恢复和学校书院的建立,程朱之学得到广泛传播,《春秋》研究在此大背景下得到较大的发展。尤其是胡安国的《春秋传》在元代盛极一时,不仅被立为科举考试的标准用书,还出现了大量相关的研究著作。朱熹作为南宋理学的集大成者,虽无《春秋》专著,但其《春秋》学观点在元代仍得以承续,一方面得利于赵复北上对朱学的传播,另一方面是其门弟子黄干及其续传或私淑门人对其《春秋》观点的继承与发扬。宋室南渡后,宋儒的学术活动多集中在江浙行省一带,而元儒大体师承宋儒而来,故元代《春秋》学者及其著述的地域分布多集中在浙江、江西地区。总的来说,元代《春秋》学是对宋代《春秋》学的继承发展,虽然总体成就不高,但元代《春秋》学是《春秋》发展与传承过程中及其重要的一环,它在宋代《春秋》学与明代《春秋》学之间起到了承上启下的过渡作用,对清代《春秋》学的形成存在间接的影响。
[Abstract]:"Spring and Autumn" has always been regarded as a Confucian classic governing the world, which has been attached great importance to by scholars for thousands of years. The study of "Spring and Autumn" has been uninterrupted, even in the Yuan Dynasty, which was ruled by the Mongols for only over a hundred years. This paper makes a systematic and comprehensive analysis and statistics of the academic writings of the Yuan Dynasty, and gives a brief solution to them. On this basis, the author probes into the origin and historical and cultural background of the rise of "Spring and Autumn" in Yuan Dynasty, and analyzes the regional distribution of scholars, the general situation of academic division and the reasons for the rise of "Spring and Autumn". Then summarizes the Yuan Dynasty "Spring and Autumn" study of the overall characteristics and academic history of the status and influence. Before the Yuan Dynasty, the study of "Spring and Autumn" experienced the peak of the development of Sinology and Song studies, and the paradigm of scholars' study of "Spring and Autumn" also developed from "Wen Jie Jing" in Han and Tang Dynasty to "Yi Jie Jing" in Song Dynasty. After the unification of Yuan Dynasty, the rulers carried out the cultural policy of "governing the country by Confucianism" and actively solicited Confucian students. Zhao Fu from the south brought Cheng Zhu's learning to the north, plus the restoration of imperial examinations and the establishment of the academy of learning in the Yuan Dynasty, and the study of "Spring and Autumn" was greatly developed under this background. Especially Hu Anguo's Biography of Spring and Autumn became the most popular in Yuan Dynasty, which was not only established as the standard book for imperial examination, but also appeared a large number of related research works. Zhu Xi, as the master of Neo-Confucianism in the Southern Song Dynasty, had no monographs of "Spring and Autumn", but his views on "Spring and Autumn" were continued in the Yuan Dynasty. On the one hand, he benefited from Zhao Fu's northward spread of Zhu's study. On the other hand, his disciple Huang Gan and his continued biography or private Shumen inherited and carried forward his views on Spring and Autumn. After the south crossing of Song Dynasty, the academic activities of Confucianism in Song Dynasty were mostly concentrated in Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces, while the Confucianism in Yuan Dynasty was mainly inherited from Song Confucianism, so the regional distribution of scholars and their writings in Yuan Dynasty was mainly concentrated in Zhejiang and Jiangxi regions. Generally speaking, the "Spring and Autumn" study in the Yuan Dynasty is the inheritance and development of the "Spring and Autumn" learning in the Song Dynasty. Although the overall achievements are not high, the "Spring and Autumn" study in the Yuan Dynasty is an important link in the process of the development and inheritance of the "Spring and Autumn period". It plays a transitional role between the study of Spring and Autumn in the Song Dynasty and the study of the Spring and Autumn in the Ming Dynasty, and has an indirect influence on the formation of the study of the Spring and Autumn period in the Qing Dynasty.
【学位授予单位】：安徽师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：K225.04
本文编号：2298534
[Abstract]:"Spring and Autumn" has always been regarded as a Confucian classic governing the world, which has been attached great importance to by scholars for thousands of years. The study of "Spring and Autumn" has been uninterrupted, even in the Yuan Dynasty, which was ruled by the Mongols for only over a hundred years. This paper makes a systematic and comprehensive analysis and statistics of the academic writings of the Yuan Dynasty, and gives a brief solution to them. On this basis, the author probes into the origin and historical and cultural background of the rise of "Spring and Autumn" in Yuan Dynasty, and analyzes the regional distribution of scholars, the general situation of academic division and the reasons for the rise of "Spring and Autumn". Then summarizes the Yuan Dynasty "Spring and Autumn" study of the overall characteristics and academic history of the status and influence. Before the Yuan Dynasty, the study of "Spring and Autumn" experienced the peak of the development of Sinology and Song studies, and the paradigm of scholars' study of "Spring and Autumn" also developed from "Wen Jie Jing" in Han and Tang Dynasty to "Yi Jie Jing" in Song Dynasty. After the unification of Yuan Dynasty, the rulers carried out the cultural policy of "governing the country by Confucianism" and actively solicited Confucian students. Zhao Fu from the south brought Cheng Zhu's learning to the north, plus the restoration of imperial examinations and the establishment of the academy of learning in the Yuan Dynasty, and the study of "Spring and Autumn" was greatly developed under this background. Especially Hu Anguo's Biography of Spring and Autumn became the most popular in Yuan Dynasty, which was not only established as the standard book for imperial examination, but also appeared a large number of related research works. Zhu Xi, as the master of Neo-Confucianism in the Southern Song Dynasty, had no monographs of "Spring and Autumn", but his views on "Spring and Autumn" were continued in the Yuan Dynasty. On the one hand, he benefited from Zhao Fu's northward spread of Zhu's study. On the other hand, his disciple Huang Gan and his continued biography or private Shumen inherited and carried forward his views on Spring and Autumn. After the south crossing of Song Dynasty, the academic activities of Confucianism in Song Dynasty were mostly concentrated in Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces, while the Confucianism in Yuan Dynasty was mainly inherited from Song Confucianism, so the regional distribution of scholars and their writings in Yuan Dynasty was mainly concentrated in Zhejiang and Jiangxi regions. Generally speaking, the "Spring and Autumn" study in the Yuan Dynasty is the inheritance and development of the "Spring and Autumn" learning in the Song Dynasty. Although the overall achievements are not high, the "Spring and Autumn" study in the Yuan Dynasty is an important link in the process of the development and inheritance of the "Spring and Autumn period". It plays a transitional role between the study of Spring and Autumn in the Song Dynasty and the study of the Spring and Autumn in the Ming Dynasty, and has an indirect influence on the formation of the study of the Spring and Autumn period in the Qing Dynasty.
【学位授予单位】：安徽师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：K225.04
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 李建;;赵lx《春秋》“策书之例”与“笔削之义”说论析[J];史学史研究;2015年04期
2 石梅;;李廉《春秋诸传会通》之华夷观[J];嘉兴学院学报;2015年03期
3 申屠炉明;;论赵lx及其《春秋》学[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2015年01期
4 张欣;;《千顷堂书目》、《经义考》所收元代春秋学著述补正[J];图书馆杂志;2013年06期
5 吴志坚;;程端学及其《春秋本义》[J];文献;2011年01期
6 刘成群;韩梦飞;;元儒郑玉《春秋》学考述[J];宜宾学院学报;2009年07期
7 周国琴;;元儒程端学对《春秋》三传的辩驳[J];内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版);2007年05期
8 姚文造;;论徽州学者的《春秋》学研究[J];淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期
9 黄开国;赵lx的《春秋》学[J];中国哲学史;2004年02期
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 周翔宇;经典诠释的新发展[D];华中师范大学;2015年
2 孙旭红;居今与志古：宋代《春秋》学研究[D];华东师范大学;2011年
3 侯步云;北宋《春秋》学研究[D];西北大学;2009年
4 李建军;宋代《春秋》学与宋型文化[D];四川大学;2007年
5 文廷海;清代春秋谷梁学研究[D];华中师范大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 石梅;吴澄《春秋纂言》研究[D];江西师范大学;2015年
2 王金宁;论北朝《春秋》学的传授[D];吉林大学;2015年
3 李君杰;郑玉《春秋》学研究[D];淮北师范大学;2014年
4 袁宝君;民国春秋学研究[D];山东师范大学;2010年
5 林琳;两汉《春秋》z@梁学研究[D];山东大学;2010年
6 付丽敏;中晚唐《春秋》学研究[D];吉林大学;2008年
7 曲辉;宋代春秋学研究[D];华东师范大学;2007年
，本文编号：2298534
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2298534.html
