秦汉时期中原王朝与北方民族战争的战术比较研究
发布时间：2019-01-07 13:23
【摘要】：秦汉时期中原王朝与北方民族的战争在双方关系史上具有突出地位。本文以秦汉时期中原王朝与北方民族战争的战术为研究对象,利用现有的文献和考古实物,结合现代军事学理论,以战术为中心,从交战双方的火力、防护和机动三个方面入手,通过对双方武器装备、军队编成与战斗队形、后勤保障、协同作战及其战术特点的对比分析,认为良好的战术是战斗、战役乃至决定战争胜负的重要保证。中原王朝军队以综合国力为后盾,凭借先进的武器装备、娴熟的协同作战能力和完善的后勤保障,在战术上占有优势。战术上的优势是中原王朝军队在作战中逐渐取得优势并最终取得战争胜利的根本原因。 此外,研究认为,以游牧民族轻骑兵为主体建立的单一兵种军队在战术上是处于劣势的,其得逞于一时只是历史发展中的短时间的、反常的现象。成建制的、训练有素的骑兵才是战争所需要的骑兵这种重要兵种的存在形式。诸兵种合成军队以协同作战的战术遂行作战才是赢得战斗乃至战争胜利的保证。同时,在战斗中只有使用合适的战术才能取得战斗的胜利,反之,即使拥有装备的优势也会败北。
[Abstract]:The war between the Central Plains Dynasty and the Northern Nation in the Qin and Han dynasties played a prominent role in the history of bilateral relations. This article takes the tactics of the Central Plains Dynasty and the Northern ethnic War in the Qin and Han dynasties as the research object, using the existing literature and archaeological objects, combining with the modern military theory, taking the tactics as the center, from the firepower of the warring parties. Through the comparative analysis of the weapons and equipment of both sides, military formation and combat formation, logistics support, coordinated operations and their tactical characteristics, it is concluded that good tactics are combat. A battle or even an important guarantee of victory or defeat. With comprehensive national strength as the backing, advanced weapons and equipment, skillful cooperative combat ability and perfect logistic support, the Central Plains military had advantages in tactics. Tactical superiority is the fundamental reason why the Central Plains army gradually gained superiority and finally won the war. In addition, it is considered that the army of a single unit established mainly by the nomadic light cavalry is at a disadvantage in tactics, and its success is only a short period of time and abnormal phenomenon in the historical development. Formed, well-trained cavalry is the important form of existence of the cavalry needed in war. It is the guarantee to win the battle and even to win the war that the combined troops of all arms carry out the battle with the tactics of cooperation. At the same time, only the right tactics can be used to win the battle, otherwise, even with the advantage of equipment will be defeated.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：K232
本文编号：2403712
[Abstract]:The war between the Central Plains Dynasty and the Northern Nation in the Qin and Han dynasties played a prominent role in the history of bilateral relations. This article takes the tactics of the Central Plains Dynasty and the Northern ethnic War in the Qin and Han dynasties as the research object, using the existing literature and archaeological objects, combining with the modern military theory, taking the tactics as the center, from the firepower of the warring parties. Through the comparative analysis of the weapons and equipment of both sides, military formation and combat formation, logistics support, coordinated operations and their tactical characteristics, it is concluded that good tactics are combat. A battle or even an important guarantee of victory or defeat. With comprehensive national strength as the backing, advanced weapons and equipment, skillful cooperative combat ability and perfect logistic support, the Central Plains military had advantages in tactics. Tactical superiority is the fundamental reason why the Central Plains army gradually gained superiority and finally won the war. In addition, it is considered that the army of a single unit established mainly by the nomadic light cavalry is at a disadvantage in tactics, and its success is only a short period of time and abnormal phenomenon in the historical development. Formed, well-trained cavalry is the important form of existence of the cavalry needed in war. It is the guarantee to win the battle and even to win the war that the combined troops of all arms carry out the battle with the tactics of cooperation. At the same time, only the right tactics can be used to win the battle, otherwise, even with the advantage of equipment will be defeated.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：K232
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孟古托力;骑兵的定界和起源[J];北方文物;2003年02期
2 李宇;;秦汉时期弓、弩运用技术简论[J];沧桑;2008年04期
3 毛颖;弩机概论[J];东南文化;1998年03期
4 何平立;略论春秋战国时期车战盛衰之原因[J];军事历史研究;1992年02期
5 同利军;;汉朝与匈奴战争述评[J];军事历史;2009年01期
6 魏大鸿,熊焰;简论弓箭的起源及其在古代中国的发展[J];荆州师范学院学报;2001年02期
7 ;放射性碳素测定年代报告(四)[J];考古;1977年03期
8 贾兰坡;盖培;尤玉桂;;山西峙峪旧石器时代遗址发掘报告[J];考古学报;1972年01期
9 贾振国;;西汉齐王墓随葬器物坑[J];考古学报;1985年02期
10 臧知非;;“偃武修文”与东汉边防[J];人文杂志;2008年04期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张卫星;先秦至两汉出土甲胄研究[D];郑州大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 刘军;两汉军事后勤研究[D];吉林大学;2005年
，本文编号：2403712
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2403712.html
