汉末袁术集团研究
[Abstract]:The Operation Group is an important warlord force active in the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty. The group has benefited from the reputation of the name and reputation of the co-operation, and is good at combining the forces of the parties, and is able to rise rapidly and have the power of not being small. It is the turning point of the rise and fall of the operation group, and the collapse of the operation group is the result of the advantages and disadvantages of the end of the Han Dynasty. The first chapter mainly discusses the formation and development of the Intraoperative Group. The first section briefly describes the background of the rise of the Intraoperative Group. In the case of the first meeting of the Eastern and Eastern Han Dynasty and the East Han Dynasty, the Group defeated the Dong's Group to win the victory of the new Jun in the six-year plan, and then fell into the conflict between the internal member of the Communist Party of China and the power of the Group. The two defeat of both the official and the foreign minister made this the rise of Dong Zhuo and Yuan Shao, who belong to He. Dong Zhuo sent Yuan Shao to Luoyang, and opened the prologue of the Eastern Han Dynasty. Section II describes the early activities of the Intraoperative Group. He went to Nanyang to resist Dong Zhuo, and the group began to form. It depends on the attachment of the old part of the tiger and the Sun Jian, and the operation group is like a broken bamboo, and the loss of Dong Zhuo. As Dong Zhuo's strategy contracted and moved to Chang 'an, the two were in the wrong direction. During the operation, Sun Jian------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The strategic center of the strategy turned to Xu Yang after the defeat of the alliance and the defeat of Cao Cao after the defeat of Cao Cao. In the second chapter, we focus on the problem of the number-of-the-art group. The first part is to analyze the background of the operation number of the cataract surgery. After the operation, Xu Yang, Chen Wen, drive Liu Bei, defeated Liu Bei, Lian Lu Bu, gather the bully, the palm of the eight, and the three state of Xu Yanyu in the heyday. The powerful and well-established military situation has allowed the Operation Group to have a number of capital. Cao Cao's invasion of the Republic of Henan into the state of Henan and the emperor of the emperor had given a heavy political pressure to the operation, which directly led to the policy of the Republic of China. relying on the support of the pro-trust and some of the dependent forces, the group was able to reach the opposition of the Great and the Sun, and adopted the policy of the number one. The number of the events is actually the reflection of the decline of the Han's idea in the last years of the Eastern Han Dynasty, the rise of the generation of the Han and the private thought of the "The government is in the house". Section II describes the military operations following the Operation of the Czech Republic. Lu Bu and Sun Ce's rebellion has upset the strategic layout of the operation, and both Xuzhou and Yang-yang have been defeated. The third chapter focuses on the collapse and the cause of the group. In the north of the operation, the Qing State was blocked from the death of the river, and the operation group collapsed. The first section mainly describes the trend of its internal members after the collapse of the Intraoperative Group. In general, the fate of its members is basically that of the great majority of the famous scholars, and the other forces are more than Sun's. In addition to Sun and Cao, there are still more than one operation in the mountain, which is independent of the Yangtze and the Huaihe River, forming a buffer zone between Sun and Cao, so that the two can develop smoothly. Therefore, the collapse of the operation group led to the rise of both Sun and Cao. The second section is the cause of the collapse of the operation group. The complex of the composition of the operation group and the serious internal rolling, the difference in the number of the other forces further aggravated the contradiction between the forces, which directly led to the defection of Sun Ce. The Group has a serious flaw in the military and political measures. No matter of quality and hereditary leader, the operation group has been suffering from a mutiny, and the temporary grain of grain has made it more difficult for the operation group to lose its food. The random and loose nature of the Chinese medicine's own self-knowledge of its advantages and disadvantages can not be changed, and finally, the collapse of the group is caused by the collapse of the group, which is the manifestation of the Chinese character and the continuation of the more and more harm in the end of the Han Dynasty. The remainder of the paper makes a reexamination of the image of the history of the Chinese medicine. The image of the image in history can be generally summarized as a kind of wild and wild type. "Four. This is a reflection of the identity of the royal-type Xia, and it is also a reflection of the advantages and disadvantages of the Han Dynasty. But the image of the operation was demonized by the demonic. Although the technique was not very good, it was not as good as the book, but the pride was once loyal to the Han's room. This is a one-sided, because of the prejudice of the history and the widespread and derogatory of the history.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:K234.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 苏杰;《三国志》校诂拾零(续)[J];古籍整理研究学刊;2002年04期
2 崔泳准;关于《三国志》韩译工作的思考[J];古籍整理研究学刊;2003年05期
3 高明;近二十年来国内《三国志》词语研究述评[J];西藏民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年02期
4 董广伟;;《三国志》“德”命题论略[J];洛阳理工学院学报(社会科学版);2011年04期
5 徐澄,,成纯;《三国志》词语札记[J];杭州师范学院学报;1996年01期
6 孙维梓;;外国幽默画[J];父母必读;1995年09期
7 章惠康;记述三国史的著名史籍——《三国志》述评[J];衡水师专学报(综合版);2000年02期
8 李纯蛟;《三国志》书法略论[J];四川师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年06期
9 李玄玉;释《三国志》的“□心”[J];连云港师范高等专科学校学报;2002年03期
10 崔泳■,苏杰;《三国志》重言词略说[J];南京师范大学文学院学报;2002年02期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 杨小平;;《三国志》校释札记[A];中国训诂学研究会2010年学术年会论文摘要集[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前8条
1 记者 王瑟;最早《三国志》手抄本存于新疆[N];光明日报;2014年
2 陈虎;总揽全局文质辨洽的《三国志》[N];光明日报;2001年
3 徐宗文;小议《三国志》“裴注”的真实性[N];中华读书报;2003年
4 傅光明;史亦小说?小说亦史?[N];中国邮政报;2005年
5 颜之江;古扶余人风俗面面观[N];吉林日报;2002年
6 吴金华;曹操是“宽宏大量的”吗[N];文汇报;2007年
7 本报记者 易立权;陈寿精神[N];南充日报;2010年
8 77296部队政治委员 梅才华;由刘备失败看感情与原则[N];解放军报;2012年
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 何凌霞;《三国志》专名研究[D];复旦大学;2009年
2 崔泳准;《三国志》今译与古汉语专题研究[D];复旦大学;2003年
3 阎玉文;《三国志》复音词专题研究[D];复旦大学;2003年
4 肖瑜;《三国志》古写本用字研究[D];复旦大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 董文雅;论诸葛亮形象的演变[D];渤海大学;2015年
2 王双岭;吉川英治《三国志》研究[D];河南师范大学;2015年
3 王凯旋;“《三国志》多回护”说辨析[D];西北师范大学;2015年
4 谭金柳;“三国叙事”中的神话因素分析[D];湖北民族学院;2016年
5 李淼;《三国志》历史书写研究[D];湖南大学;2015年
6 王媛媛;《三国志》及“裴注”疑问句研究[D];西北师范大学;2016年
7 王朝霞;《三国志》中的比较句研究[D];西南交通大学;2017年
8 王越;汉末袁术集团研究[D];山东大学;2017年
9 陈绍唐;《三国志》关键人物评价辨疑[D];兰州大学;2007年
10 刘小姣;《三国志》战争描写研究[D];西南大学;2012年
本文编号:2416021
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2416021.html